Poisson Statistics in Solid State Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Poisson statistics to the Drude model in solid-state physics, specifically regarding electron collisions. Part (a) demonstrates that the probability of an electron experiencing no collisions in time t is e^(-t/τ). In part (b), the probability that the time interval between two collisions falls between t and t + dt is derived as (dt/τ)e^(-t/τ). Parts (c) and (d) focus on showing that the mean time to the next collision and the mean time between collisions are both τ. The participant expresses confusion about the approach to parts (c) and (d), seeking clarification on how to effectively use the Poisson distribution for these calculations.
blue2004STi
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the Drude model the probability of an electron having a collision in an infinitesimal time interval dt is given by dt/\tau.
(a) Show that an electron picked at random at a given moment will have no collisions during the next t seconds with probability e-t/\tau.
(b) Show that the probability that the time interval between two successive collisions of an electron falls in the range between t and t + dt is (dt/\tau)e(-t/\tau)
(c) Show as a consequence of a) that at any moment the mean time up to the next collision averaged over alll electrons is \tau.
(d) Show that as a consequence of b) that the mean time between successive collisions is \tau.


Homework Equations


Probability of a collision per unit time = t/\tau
Poisson Distribution of Random Variables, Poisson(k,\lambda)= (\lambdake-dt/\tau)/k!


The Attempt at a Solution


So I proved part (a) by using the Poisson Distribution of RV's. Part (b) I tried to do the same thing as part (a), but for the time interval I used (t+dt)-t which gave me a lambda of dt/\tau. Then I used k = 1 and went from there and it worked until the exponent where I got e-dt/\tau rather than e-t/\tau. Part (c) and (d) are where I get lost and have no clue of what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After discussing this with my professor he said that to solve this problem you don't have to use the Poisson distribution, that being said he also told me that "if you ask the distribution the right questions" that it can be solved using the distribution. Not sure what this means in terms of how to use it... I don't understand how to approach the problem other than using the distribution and for part b) apparently I was wrong originally, but I'm not exactly sure what to "ask" the distribution.

If C is the time between collisions, I know that I want to know P(t < C < t + dt)...now this is where I get stuck, I'm not entirely sure where to go from here...Thoughts?

Thanks,

Matt
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top