Polarisation of Light: Understanding Polaroid Sheets and Intensity Measurements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of unpolarized light passing through three Polaroid sheets, with an emphasis on calculating the final amplitude of light after transmission. The initial intensity after the first Polaroid is given as I = E^2, and the angles of the subsequent sheets are critical for determining the amplitude. Participants clarify that the amplitude changes through each Polaroid as E, E*cos(alpha), and E*cos(alpha)*cos(beta-alpha), highlighting that the intensity calculation can be misleading. The final amplitude can be derived from intensity since intensity equals the square of amplitude, leading to the conclusion that taking the square root of the final intensity provides the correct amplitude. Overall, the discussion reinforces the distinction between amplitude as a vector and intensity as a scalar measurement.
ku1005
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Unpolarised light is shone onto a set of three transmission Polaroid sheets. The intensity of light after the first Polaroid sheet is measured to be I = E2. The transmission axis of the second and third Polaroid sheets are at angles of alpha and beta with respect to the transmission axis of the first Polaroid sheet. The amplitude of light emerging from the set of Polaroid sheets is:


Homework Equations



Intensity = I (MAX) * (cos(theta))^2

The Attempt at a Solution


My workings follow :

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8982/polaroidphysicsqbq3.png

Why, is the answer then :
http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/334/answertoplroidti7.png

which part of my workings are incorrect/show lack of understanding??

(see above)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
just thinking now, it because the amplitude of light is unaffected by the intensity of the light, and therefore, throughout the 3 polaroids, the amplitude of the light will simply change via:

E-> first

Ecos(alpha) through second

Ecos(alpha)cos(beta-alpha) through third

We only need the component of Amplitude transmitted, not the intensity, the intensity bit is a distraction/trap

is this correct thinking?
 
It is correct thinking.
 
You had it right the first time.

You forgot that the question is asking for the final amplitude. This can be deduced from the final intensity because:

I=E^2

So all you needed after your third equation was to take the square root.

Amplitude is a vector and is can be thought of as a wave; thus it requires an imaginary phase.

Intensity is the square of amplitude and can be measured and thus has no imaginary parts. It is not a wave.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top