Polarized Slab between Parallel Plate Electrode

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the electric field in a permanently polarized slab situated between parallel plate electrodes under a potential difference. The equations provided include the displacement field D and the relationship between electric field E and polarization P. The user attempts to solve for the electric fields inside and outside the slab but is uncertain due to the lack of a specified value for ε. Clarification is sought on whether "permanently polarized" implies independence from the applied field, which is believed to be the case, leading to questions about the implications for ε. The conversation emphasizes the need for understanding the relationship between polarization and the electric field in this context.
Gandhi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the electric field everywhere for the following permanently polarized structures which do not support any free charge:
(b) Permanently polarized slab P_0 i_x of thickness b placed between parallel plate electrodes in free space at potential difference V_0



Homework Equations


D = ε_0 E + P
D = εE


The Attempt at a Solution


E_0(s-b) + E_i b = V_0 where E_0 is the electric field outside the slab and E_i is the electric field inside the slab.
εE_i = ε_0E_0 + P_0
From here I was thinking, since I have a coupled equation, I would solve for E_i and E_0 but I don't know if the above method will work since the value of ε was not given.
Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • hw.jpg
    hw.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
When they say the polarization is permanent - do they mean that it does not depend on the applied field?
 
Simon Bridge said:
When they say the polarization is permanent - do they mean that it does not depend on the applied field?
It does not specify but I believe that is the case.
 
So what does that tell you about ##\epsilon##?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top