MHB PolkaDots 54's question at Yahoo Answers (Diagonalization, conic section))

AI Thread Summary
The conic section represented by the equation 3x^2 + 2xy + 3y^2 - 8 = 0 is identified through diagonalization using the Spectral theorem. The associated matrix has eigenvalues of 2 and 4, leading to eigenspaces that provide the basis for the transformation. An orthonormal basis is established, allowing for a change of coordinates that simplifies the equation. The resulting equation in the new coordinates is (x')^2 + 2(y')^2 = 4, which describes an ellipse. Thus, the conic section is confirmed to be an ellipse.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Use diagonalization to identify the conic section 3x^2 + 2xy + 3y^2 - 8 = 0

Here is a link to the question:

Diagonalization to identify conic section? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello PolkaDots 54,

We'll use the Spectral theorem. We can express $3x^2 + 2xy + 3y^2 - 8 = 0$:
$$(x,y) \begin{pmatrix}{3}&{1}\\{1}&{3} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}{x}\\{y}\end{pmatrix}=8 \Leftrightarrow (x,y)A \begin{pmatrix}{x}\\{y}\end{pmatrix}=8$$ Eigenvalues of $A$:
$$\chi(\lambda)=\det (A-\lambda I)=\begin{vmatrix}{3-\lambda}&{1}\\{1}&{3-\lambda}\end{vmatrix}=\lambda^2-6\lambda+8=0\Leftrightarrow \lambda= 2\:\vee\;\lambda=4$$ Basis of the eigenspaces: $$\ker\;(A-2I)\;\equiv\left \{
\begin{array}{rcrcr}
\,x_1 & + & \,x_2 & = & 0 \\
\,x_1 & + & \,x_2 & = & 0
\end{array}
\right .\quad ,\quad B_2=\{(1,-1)\}$$
$$\ker\;(A-4I)\;\equiv\left \{
\begin{array}{rcrcr}
-\,x_1 & + & \,x_2 & = & 0 \\
\,x_1 & - & \,x_2 & = & 0
\end{array}
\right .\quad ,\quad B_4=\{(1,1)\}$$ Eigenvectors orthonormal basis of $\mathbb{R}^2$:
$$B=\left\{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1,-1),\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1,1)\right\}$$ Change of basis matrix (orthogonal because its columns are orthonormal) :
$$P=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}{\;\;1}&{1}\\{-1}&{1}\end{pmatrix}$$ Change of coordinates:
$$\begin{pmatrix}{x}\\{y} \end{pmatrix}=P \begin{pmatrix}{x'}\\{y'} \end{pmatrix}$$ Then, $$(x,y)A \begin{pmatrix}{x}\\{y} \end{pmatrix}=8\Leftrightarrow (x',y')P^TAP \begin{pmatrix}{x'}\\{y'} \end{pmatrix}=8\Leftrightarrow (x',y')P^{-1}AP \begin{pmatrix}{x'}\\{y'} \end{pmatrix}=8\\ (x',y') \begin{pmatrix}{2}&{0}\\{0}&{4} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}{x'}\\{y'} \end{pmatrix}=8\Leftrightarrow 2(x')^2+4(y')^2=8\Leftrightarrow (x')^2+2(y')^2=4$$ The equation of the conic with respect to $B$ is $(x')^2+2(y')^2=4$ or equivalently $$\boxed{\dfrac{(x')^2}{2^2}+\dfrac{(y')^2}{(\sqrt{2})^2}=1\quad (\mbox{ellipse})}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top