Possible webpage title: What Type of Simple Machine Has an Efficiency of 81.7%?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the efficiency of a simple machine, which is found to be 81.7%. The user correctly applies the formulas for work output and work input but uses a nonstandard value for gravitational acceleration. The low efficiency suggests significant friction or air resistance affecting the machine's performance. The maximum theoretical efficiency is stated to be 100%, indicating that real-world machines will always have some energy loss. The conversation concludes with a prompt to identify the type of simple machine that could exhibit such efficiency.
scientist
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Could I please have a tutor check my answer and solution?

question: An effort of 3 kN is required to move a mass of 2000 kg in a certain simple machine. If the mass is raised 1.5 meters while the effort moves 12 meters, find the efficiency?

2. equations used in solution:

work output = load x distance moved by load
work input = effort x distance moved by effort
efficiency = work output / work input
3kN = 3000 Newtons

The Attempt at a Solution



my solution:

efficiency = work output / work input

mass = 2000 kg =19613.3 Newtons x 1.5 meters /

3000 Newtons x 12 meters

effort = 29419.95 Nm / 353039.4 Nm

= 0.817

Now, is it possible to have such a low efficiency in a machine? What simple machine would this be?





 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
scientist said:
efficiency = work output / work input

mass = 2000 kg =19613.3 Newtons x 1.5 meters /

3000 Newtons x 12 meters

effort = 29419.95 Nm / 353039.4 Nm

= 0.817
Your solution is correct, although you seemed to have used a nonstandard value for the acceleration due to gravity.
scientist said:
Now, is it possible to have such a low efficiency in a machine? What simple machine would this be?
Why do you think that this efficiency is low? What is the maximum theoretically possible efficiency?
 
Which nonstandard value did I use?

Why do you think that this efficiency is low? What is the maximum theoretically possible efficiency? The maximum theoretically possible efficiency would be 100%.

I think the efficiency is low because we have a number of .817.The efficiency of any machine depends upon the amount of friction and air resistance present. A frictionless machine would have an efficiency of 100%. Here we have .817 for efficiency, so we must have a lot friction or air resistance.
 
scientist said:
Which nonstandard value did I use?
You used g = 9.80665, which is indeed the standard acceleration due to gravity; however, g is more commonly approximated to 9.81 since the actual value of g varies greatly depending on location. It is not a serious problem though.
scientist said:
The maximum theoretically possible efficiency would be 100%.
I think the efficiency is low because we have a number of .817
Note here, that 0.817 is not a percentage efficiency.
 
Ok, the percentage efficiency is 81.7%. How can I find out what kind of simple machine this would be?
 
scientist said:
Ok, the percentage efficiency is 81.7%. How can I find out what kind of simple machine this would be?
Correct. Consider what type of machine/system would operate in such a way?
scientist said:
An effort of 3 kN is required to move a mass of 2000 kg in a certain simple machine. If the mass is raised 1.5 meters while the effort moves 12 meters[...]
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top