I Postive rays in cathode ray tube experiments?

sol47739
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I have some questions about the cathode ray experiments they did back in history and what the positive rays consist of about which I read in a book.
I read in the following book A history of the sciences by Stephen F. Mason. About the discovery of the electron the write what I attached in the picture.

I wonder what do these positive rays traveling in the opposite direction they talk about consist of? Some ions or what? I understand that the negative rays consist of electrons but positive rays? I can’t understand that it could be positrons since these cathode ray tubes are such simple equipment and at low energies that no positrons can appear. But what do they consist of? And what are they referring to?
 

Attachments

  • bild.png
    bild.png
    105.7 KB · Views: 154
Physics news on Phys.org
They are ions; atoms missing one or more electrons. If it was Hydrogen gas then you could call them protons, otherwise it takes way too much energy to break apart the nucleus of an atom for these guys to have done.
 
  • Like
Likes sol47739 and tech99
The tube would usually contain air, so positive ions of nitrogen and oxygen will be formed. I happened to find a de-mountable tube, vacuum pump and 5 kV power supply at a school where I worked and we did the experiment. A magnet does not deflect the heavy positive rays.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top