Potential Barrier for different types of junctions

Joseph8022
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
How I can calculate the Potential Barrier when we have a metal- semiconductor, metal- metal, or p-n junction ? Can I calculate the Potential Barrier by using a workfuncion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The exact shape of the barrier is usually modeled using self-consistent calculations - depending on the exact structures being modeled.

The height of the barrier can sometimes be worked out from the band-mismatch.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
The exact shape of the barrier is usually modeled using self-consistent calculations - depending on the exact structures being modeled.

The height of the barrier can sometimes be worked out from the band-mismatch.

Thank you! I have a lot of formulas for calculating the Potential Barrier, and I get confused with them. I'm not sure about it ! In p-n junction, can I find the Potential Barrier by finding the difference in Fermi energy of the p and n-type junction? What about if I have a metal-semiconductor junction ?
 
You should be able to make out what your formulas are about by sketching the band profiles next to each other.
At the junction you'd get some band bending irl.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You should be able to make out what your formulas are about by sketching the band profiles next to each other.
At the junction you'd get some band bending irl.


Thank you, again ! I need to know the formula for calculating the Potential Barrier in p-n junction, please, write it down if you know it.
 
In general?

It's a self-consistent calculation using Poisson's equation to work out the band bending and the Schrodinger equation to work out the charge distribution. Rinse and repeat. What level education are you doing this at? Did you have a specific p-n junction in mind?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top