Potential in the three regions of an infinite slab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the boundary conditions for electric fields and potentials in the context of an infinite slab. It emphasizes that while electric potential can have an arbitrary reference point, the electric field cannot be freely chosen and must adhere to specific conditions. Participants explore justifying the condition that the electric field at z = 0 is zero due to the symmetry of the charge distribution. The conversation also encourages the use of LaTeX for clarity in mathematical expressions. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the application of boundary conditions in electrostatics.
workhorse123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The charge density in the region
-z’<z<z’
depends only on z; that is,
p=p’cos(pi z/z’)
where p’ and z’ are constants. Determine the potential in all regions of space
Relevant Equations
Poisons equation, laplace equation
for the boundary conditions for this problem I understand that Electric field and Electric potential will be continuous on the boundaries.
I also know that I can set the reference point for Electric potential, wherever it is convenient. This gives me the fifth boundary condition. I am confused at where I find the last boundary condition.

1700501779671.png
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
If possible, please type in your work using Latex, rather than posting snapshots of your work. Additional guidelines for posting in the homework forums can be found here.

You cannot arbitrarily choose a "zero point" for the electric field like you can with the potential. However, can you justify the condition ##E_{\text{at} \, z = 0} = 0## from the symmetrical nature of the charge distribution in this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and workhorse123
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top