Potential of a Solid Charged Sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total potential energy of a uniformly charged sphere with radius 'a' and charge Q. The potential inside the sphere is derived as V_in = (Q/8πε₀a)(3 - r²/a²), ensuring continuity at the boundary. The participants clarify that the potential energy inside is negative due to the reference point at infinity, and they discuss the appropriate method for calculating energy stored inside and outside the sphere. The correct approach involves using U = (1/2)∫ρV dτ for the total potential energy and U = (ε₀/2)∫E² dτ for energy in the fields. Ultimately, they confirm that the calculations align with the principle that the energy outside the sphere is five times that inside.
jmtome2
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sphere of radius 'a' contains a charge Q, uniformly distributed throughout it's volume. Calculate the total potential energy of this configuration.


Homework Equations


U=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau

with \rho=charge density
and V=potential


The Attempt at a Solution


Potential of a Charged Sphere is V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}
Uniform Charge Density of a Sphere is \rho=\frac{Q}{Vol}=\frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi\cdot a^{3}}

Therefore our equation becomes:
U=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi\cdot a^{3}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right) \int \frac{1}{r}d\tau

In spherical coordinates, d\tau=r^2sin(\theta)drd\theta\d\phi

U=\frac{Q^2}{\frac{32}{3}\pi^2\espilon_0\cdot a^3} \int^{a}_{0} rdr \int^{\pi}_{0} sin(\theta) d\theta \int^{2\pi}_{0} d\phi

Final: U=\left(\frac{3}{16}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This result looks a little bizarre to me... did I miss anything?
 
jmtome2 said:
Potential of a Charged Sphere is V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}

Is it really? Even inside the sphere?
 
Potential of a Solid Charged Sphere Inside: <br /> V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}<br />

i think...
 
Don't guess, calculate...what is the field inside and outside a uniformly charged sphere?
 
OK i got the problem worked out, thanks... one question left tho, I get a negative number for the potential and, therefore a negative result for the potential energy

<br /> V_{in}=\frac{-Q\cdot r^{2}}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}}<br />

and

<br /> U_{in}=-\left(\frac{3}{80}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)<br />

Does it make sense that the potnetial energy inside is negative?
 
You seem to be missing a constant term in your potential. In most cases, adding or subtracting a constant doesn't matter, but the formula you are using for U assumes that the potential goes to zero at infinity...
 
I thought about the constant term and realized that the potential needs to go to 0 as r goes to infinity, but noticed 2 things...

Firstly, no constant is going to be able to compesate for fact that V_in has to go to infinity as r goes to inifinity

Secondly, the problem later goes on to state that the outside potential energy is five times the potential energy of the inside, which is the result that we get if no constant is added to V_in after integration of E

So... what do you suggest? Maybe there's some way to justify this result or...?
 
jmtome2 said:
Firstly, no constant is going to be able to compesate for fact that V_in has to go to infinity as r goes to inifinity

Of course not! Vin is only defined for r\leq a, but Vout must go to zero as r\to\infty, and the potential must be continuous at r=a
 
  • #10
that last condition must imply then that the inside potential must be positive, but how can this be since E_in is postive and is the negative gradient of V_in?
 
  • #11
The gradient of a constant is zero, so adding a constant will not affect the field, even if the constant is large enough to make the potential positive...

What diid you get for the field inside and out? What do you get when you integrate it?

V_{\text{in}}(r)=-\int_{\infty}^r\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{s}=-\int_{\infty}^a\textbf{E}_\text{{out}}\cdot d\textbf{s}-\int_{a}^r\textbf{E}_{\text{in}}\cdot d\textbf{s}

The first term corresponds to your constant!:wink:
 
  • #12
Ok...

For E_in, i get...
<br /> E_{in}=\frac{Q\cdot r}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}}<br />

Integrating, for V_in, i get...
<br /> V_{in}=\int^{r}_{0}\frac{Q\cdot r}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}} dr<br />

and therefore,...
<br /> V_{in}=\frac{Q\cdot r^{2}}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}} + C<br />
 
  • #13
Why are you integrating from zero to r? And why are you just adding a constant on the end of a definite integral like that?

If your reference point is at infinity, the you need to integrate from infinity to r as shown in my previous post.
 
  • #14
So I get that

<br /> V_{in}=\frac{Q}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}\right)<br />

I like where this is going :)
 
  • #15
Last question?

So final V_in and V_out are:

<br /> V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}<br />

and

<br /> V_{in}=\frac{Q}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}\right)<br />

Which fixes the continuity of V problem that I had earlier when r=a.


Now upon calculating U_in and U_out, i get:

<br /> U_{out}=\left(\frac{3}{16}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)<br />

and

<br /> U_{out}=\left(\frac{3}{20}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)<br />

However, at the end of the problem, it states that "there is five times more energy outside than inside". I'm I not calculating the energy stored inside and outside correctly?
 
  • #16
The integral,

U=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau

gives the total potential energy of the distribution (Remember, \rho is zero outside the sphere, so using this formula to calculate the enrgy stored in the fields outside the sphere makes no sense at all!)

If you are asked to find the energy stored in the fields inside and out, you'll want to use

U=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int E^2 d\tau

You should of course find that

U_{in}+U_{out}=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Thank you! It all works out and makes sense! I found that equation hiding at the end of section 2.4.3 in Griffith's right before I got your response but you clarified it perfectly... Feels so good to see the big picture after drudging through this all day
 
  • #18
Thank you! It all works out and makes sense! I found that equation hiding at the end of section 2.4.3 in Griffith's right before I got your response but you clarified it perfectly... Feels so good to see the big picture after drudging through this all day
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
585
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
609
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K