Probability amplitudes, de Broglie and Schrödinger

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
What is the relationship between the "matter waves" described by de Broglie, the probability amplitude function and Schrödinger's wave equation?

I've read the following:

"The wavelengths postulated by de Broglie to be associated with the motions of particles are in reality the wavelengths of the probability amplitudes or wave functions."

I've also read:

"What is a wave function? The short answer is that it is a probability amplitude, that also happens to solve Schrodinger’s equation."

Are they all versions of the same thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavefunction in one dimension is simply some function f(x) that solves Schroedinger's equation. It is called a "wave" function because the Schroedinger equation is mathematically similar to the so-called Wave Equation (Wikipedia explains).

The probability amplitude is the square of the wavefunction. This is a postulate, so you'll have to remember it, or remember an analogy.

In fact, it is analogous to the electric field (wave) E(x), since we think about |E(x)|^2 as the intensity of the wave.
 
This post is a spin-off of the original post that discussed Barandes theory, A new realistic stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, for any details about the interpretation in general PLEASE look up for an answer there. Now I want this post to focus on this pre-print: J. A. Barandes, "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory", arXiv 2402.16935 (2024) My main concerns are that Barandes thinks this deflates the anti-classical Bell's theorem. In Barandes...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top