Probability of Finding Particle in New Potential for Doubled Spring Constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of finding a particle in the ground state of a 1D harmonic oscillator when the spring constant is doubled. The relationship between the spring constant and the parameter alpha is clarified, indicating that doubling k results in alpha being multiplied by the square root of 2. The participants address the correct formulation of the integral for probability, emphasizing that it should be the amplitude squared after integration. The integral can be simplified by combining the exponents of the wave functions from the old and new potentials. Ultimately, the conversation resolves around correctly applying these concepts to find the desired probability.
kl14
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


particle in ground state of 1D harmonic oscillator - spring constant is doubled - what is the probability of finding the particle in the ground state of the new potential



Homework Equations


v=1/2kx^2 oscillator potential
wavefunction ground state n=0 = (alpha/pi)^1/4*e^[(-apha*x^2)/2]
alpha = sqroot[(k*m)/hbar^2)]


The Attempt at a Solution



the probability will be = integral[wavefunction old*wavefunction new]dx

initial equation d^2psi/dx^2 + [2m(E-1/2kx^2)/hbar]psi = 0
if you double k in the potential V(x)- the equation is d^2psi/dx^2 + [2m(E-kx^2)/hbar]psi = 0

does this change alpha to 2k? this makes the integral very complex to solve.
or can this be done by changing the wavefunction for the new potential to (alpha/2pi)^1/4*e^[(-apha*x^2)/2]

the change being 2pi - doubling the range of the spring constant?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kl14 said:
does this change alpha to 2k?

No. How is alpha related to k? What happens to alpha if k is doubled? Does it stay the same? Double? Or what?
 
alpha = sqrt(k*reduced mass/hbar^2)
so doubling k would just be alpha = sqrt(2k*reduced mass/hbar^2)

so if i take the 2 out it is basically just multiplying alpha by sqrt(2). and substituting this into my wave function would give me the wave function for the new potential. does that make sense?
 
Yes. So now you have the two wave functions. Earlier, you wrote

the probability will be = integral[wavefunction old*wavefunction new]dx

but this is not quite right. The integral gives you the amplitude; what do you need to do to get the probability?
 
kl14 :

Your original quesion was how to solve the integral. Avodyne pointed out an error you did with the sqrt(2).

But to calculate the integral, you get something like:
k_1 k_2 e^{-a_1 x^2 }\cdot e^{-a_2 x^2} = K \cdot e^{-(a_1 +a_2 )x^2}
as integrand, where a_1 is the old number you have in the old wave function and so on. There is not any harder to calc this integral then the ordinary one, just make the substitution (a_1 + a_2) = A, and integrate from x=-inf to +inf; that integral exists in standard integral-tables.
 
yes, i realize my error in typing - the probability is the amplitude squared - the value obtained after the integration.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top