B Probability of future event as predicted by laws of nature

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter shivakumar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Probability
AI Thread Summary
The probability of a sunrise tomorrow is considered to be 1.000000, indicating certainty based on natural laws. However, discussions arise about the need for specificity in probability calculations, particularly regarding the sample space and the denominator used in calculations. Theoretical scenarios, such as creating multiple copies of the universe to observe outcomes, highlight the complexities involved in determining probabilities. Additionally, unique circumstances, like an experimenter at the poles, could challenge the assumption of certainty. Overall, while the probability of a sunrise is deemed absolute, the underlying calculations and assumptions warrant careful consideration.
shivakumar
Messages
12
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
every sure event like sunrise has probability of one
does the sample space of this kind of sure event contain only one event?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The probability of a sunrise tomorrow is 1.000000.
In general, you would need to be more specific about how you got your number. But in a case like that, "1" will do.
 
Yes, until that day when the Sun fails to rise.
 
FactChecker said:
Yes, until that day when the Sun fails to rise.
And that's when the you need to get into exactly what's in the denominator of your probability calculation. For example, if you made 10,000 perfect copies of the universe and allowed each one to run 24 hours, then you might use sunrise_successes/10,000 as your probability. But you would still have to explain why you didn't get the same result from all 10,000. And, of course, directions to the nearest successful universe would also be handy.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
.Scott said:
The probability of a sunrise tomorrow is 1.000000.
An experimenter camped out at the north or south pole might disagree.
 
jbriggs444 said:
An experimenter camped out at the north or south pole might disagree.
The OP's from India - and he's not the guy who says that except for one night, he's never played poker before.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top