Problem with non-commutative functions(quantum mechanics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter GarethB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the derivative of the function G(λ) = e^(λA)e^(λB) in quantum mechanics. The user initially attempts to use Taylor expansion for G(λ) and differentiate term by term, but realizes this approach is flawed as it does not incorporate the necessary multiplication by G. They clarify that the correct method involves applying the product rule for differentiation and utilizing a provided identity from the textbook. Ultimately, they confirm that substituting this identity leads to the desired result for dG/dλ. The conversation highlights the complexities of non-commutative operators in quantum mechanics and the importance of careful mathematical manipulation.
GarethB
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. I am working through E.Merzbacher quantum mechanics. The problem is;
if G(λ) =eλAeλB for two operators A and B, show that
dG/dλ=[A+B+λ[A,B]/1!+λ2[A,[A,B]]/2!+....]G



2. [A,B] is taken to mean AB-BA



3. The only way I can think of proving this is by taylor expanding G(λ) and then differentiang each term in the expansion with respect to λ; this has not worked! Can anyone please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to expand on my attempt at a solution so far, which I think is barking up the wrong tree even though it seems close is;
1) taylor expand G(λ) at f(0) I get

G=1+λ[A+B]+λ2(A2+2AB+B2)/2!+...
=1+λ[A+B]+λ2(A+B)2/2!+λ3(A+B)3/3!
and then what makes this tempting is that differentiating with respect to λ I get
dG/dλ=[A+B]+λ(A+B)2/1!+λ2(A+B)3/2!

Why I am sure this is the wrong approach is that;
1. the whole expansion is supposed to be multiplied by G, which clearly it is not
2. I have no idea if the (A+B)2, (A+B)3 can be expressed it the commutative notation [A,B], [A,[A,B]] etc. probably not so back to square one.
 
be more careful when expanding quadratics since (A+B)(A+B) = A^2 +AB +BA +B^2 = A^2 +[A,B] +2BA +B^2
 
Last edited:
Sorry perhaps I was unclear, I know that the quadratic expansions do not equal where I am (was) trying to get.
Anyway I have since cracked it. The procedure is to use the prouct rule to get dG/dλ. You then multiply by eλbe-λb. You end up with
dG/dλ=[B+eλbAe-λb]G
The term eλbAe-λb] is an identity provided in the textbook. Substitution of this identity gives the result. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top