Projectile Motion's relationship with Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of a projectile launched from a ramp using principles of kinetic and potential energy. The initial velocity is derived from the equation PE = KE, leading to the formula vx = √(2*g*hr) for the x-component of velocity. To determine the time of flight, the equation Δy = vy + 0.5gt^2 is used, resulting in t = √{(2*Δy)/g}. The user questions the validity of using Δx = vx*t for range calculation, expressing concern about it resembling an average velocity equation. Ultimately, they conclude that the distance formula d = v(initial)*t + 1/2*a*t^2 is the correct approach, confirming their understanding of the problem.
Whakataku
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Imagine a ramp setup on top of a tall table. The height Δy is measured. To find the initial velocity at the instant the ball leaves the ramp, I set up the kinetic energy and potential energy equal to each other to find the initial velocity of the x component.

PE = KE
m*g*(hr) = 0.5*m*v^2
where hr is the height of the ramp and v is initial velocity (x-component)

solving for vx (x-component velocity), I got:
vx = √(2*g*hr)

To get the time for the object's time in flight:
y'-y= vy + 0.5gt^2
Δy= vy + 0.5gt^2, where Δy is the height from the ground to the ramp.
since θ= 0° I found t to be:
t = √{ (2*∆y)/g }

Now my question is how do I find the range of this object?
I started out with Δx = vx*t ; where vx is the initial x-component velocity... is that even right?
I'm hesitant to use it because written as Δx/t, it looks like an average velocity equation.
Furthermore, in Wikipedia I saw the equation

d= {v*cos(\Theta)}/g * [v*sin(\Theta) + sqrt(v*sin(\Theta)^2+2g*y)]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_of_a_projectile"
under uneven ground

but the problem is I don't have final velocity... or can I calculate the final velocity with the givens... if so how??

Could anyone please nudge me in the right direction to find Δx?

thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I solved it... duh.

in the distance formula
d = v(initial)*t + 1/2*a*t^2.v(initial) and time is already attained and the the a acceleration is -9.81m/s^2
Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top