Proof of a vectoral differentation identity by levi civita symbol

advphys
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove,
∇x(ψv)=ψ(∇xv)-vx(∇ψ)
using levi civita symbol and tensor notations

Homework Equations



εijkεimnjnδkmknδjm

The Attempt at a Solution




i tried for nth component

εnjk (d/dxjklm ψl vm

εknjεklm (d/dxj) ψl vm

using εijkεimnjnδkmknδjm

i got,

(d/dxjn vj - (d/dxjj vn

But, i can't go further. I think only one simple step is left to show it is equal to the right hand side of the given identity. But how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi advphys,

That identity is not applicable here. Why do you have two levi-civita symbols? And ψ is a scalar, not a vector.

(∇ x ψv)i = εijk(∂/∂xj)ψvk
 
Because i may not know any other identity. :D

I thought for (ψv)k term i may have one more levi civita symbol.
 
Just evaluate the derivative using the product rule, and remember that (∇ψ)i = ∂ψ/∂xi
 
advphys said:
I thought for (ψv)k term i may have one more levi civita symbol.

ψv is a vector with components ψvi, so the cross product ∇ x ψv is simply the vector with components εijk(∂/∂xj)(ψvk)
 
Oh, yes. Definitely.
Thanks a lot, i got that.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top