Proving feasibility of convex linear combination in LP problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter dopey9
  • Start date Start date
dopey9
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Let x1, . . . , xk be feasible solutions of the linear programming problem:

Maximize z = (c^t)*x subject to Ax < = b and x >= 0,
so for i= 1, . . . , k, Axi <=b and xi >=0,

Let v be any convex linear combination of x1, . . . , xk.

i want to show that v is also a feasible solution of the problem..does anyone know how to show this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the definition of "feasible solution" and show that any convex linear combination satisfies it.
 
Let v = \alpha_1 x_1 + \alpha_2 x_2 + \cdots, where \alpha_i \geq 0, \forall i are real numbers in which \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 + \cdots = 1.

Then
\alpha_1 A x_1 + \alpha_2 A x_2 + \cdots \leq \alpha_1 b + \alpha_2 b + \cdots.

Hence
Av \leq b.

Note also that v \geq 0.
 
Last edited:
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top