MHB Proving Integer Coefficients in Polynomial Rings w/ Gauss Lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Rings
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Prove that if f(x) and g(x) are polynomials with rational co-efficients whose product f(x)g(x) has integer co-efficients, then the product of any co-efficient of g(x) with any coefficient of f(x) is an integer.

My initial thoughts on this are that the exercise seems to be set up for an application of Gauss Lemma since we have that Z is a UFD with field of fractions Q and further we have $$ p(x) \in Z[x] $$ where p(x) = f(x)g(x) and $$ f(x), g(x) \in Q[x] $$.

Thus we apply Gauss Lemma (see attached) so

p(x) = (rf(x))(sg(x))

where $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in Z[x] $$

But ... where to from here ... can someone please help me advance from here ...

Peter

[This problem has also been posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Prove that if f(x) and g(x) are polynomials with rational co-efficients whose product f(x)g(x) has integer co-efficients, then the product of any co-efficient of g(x) with any coefficient of f(x) is an integer.

My initial thoughts on this are that the exercise seems to be set up for an application of Gauss Lemma since we have that Z is a UFD with field of fractions Q and further we have $$ p(x) \in Z[x] $$ where p(x) = f(x)g(x) and $$ f(x), g(x) \in Q[x] $$.

Thus we apply Gauss Lemma (see attached) so

p(x) = (rf(x))(sg(x))

where $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in Z[x] $$

But ... where to from here ... can someone please help me advance from here ...

The one thing I would think of is that given

$$ p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ where $$p(x)=f(x)g(x)$$ and $$ f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x]-\mathbb{Z}[x] $$, there exist some $$r,s \in \mathbb{Z}$$ so that $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ are both primitive polynomials. Gauss's lemma tells us that $$r s \cdot p(x) = rf(x) \cdot sg(x)$$ must be a primitive polynomial itself. It follows that $$r,s=\pm 1$$, which means that we have deduced that f and g must have integer coefficients after all.

Clearly, if what I said holds, the statement would follow. Either there is some flaw in my logic, or Gauss's Lemma is too powerful a tool for this problem...
 
TheBigBadBen said:
The one thing I would think of is that given

$$ p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x] $$ where $$p(x)=f(x)g(x)$$ and $$ f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x]-\mathbb{Z}[x] $$, there exist some $$r,s \in \mathbb{Z}$$ so that $$ rf(x), sg(x) \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$$ are both primitive polynomials. Gauss's lemma tells us that $$r s \cdot p(x) = rf(x) \cdot sg(x)$$ must be a primitive polynomial itself. It follows that $$r,s=\pm 1$$, which means that we have deduced that f and g must have integer coefficients after all.

Clearly, if what I said holds, the statement would follow. Either there is some flaw in my logic, or Gauss's Lemma is too powerful a tool for this problem...

I made a mistake here: r and s are not necessarily integers. Since $r\,f(x)$ and $s\,g(x)$ are primitive, we can only guarantee that $r,s \in \mathbb{Q}$. This is still, however, sufficient; following the proof, we still find that $r\,s=\pm1$, which is enough to tell us that the product of a coefficient from one and a coefficient from the other is an integer.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top