Proving Linearity of Transformation: f as a Real Number

AI Thread Summary
To prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F, it is essential to demonstrate that it satisfies the properties of linearity. Specifically, T must fulfill T(a + b) = T(a) + T(b) and T(ca) = cT(a) for any polynomials a, b in P2 and real number c. The discussion confirms that T(p1 + p2) = T(p1) + T(p2) and T(cp1) = cT(p1), thus showing the required properties. It is clarified that f can be treated like a real number for the purpose of this proof, but it is not a real number itself. The conclusion affirms that the provided reasoning is sufficient to establish T as a linear transformation.
bifodus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let f: R --> R and let T: P2 --> F, and T(p) = p(f). Prove that T is a linear transformation.

P2 is the set of polynomials of degree 2 or less, and F is the set of all functions.

It seems to me that I can treat f as really just a real number, in which case it's no different from proving T(p) = p(x) for all x in R. Is it this simple?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can treat f similarly to a real number, because you can add and multiply real-valued functions, but you can't treat it as a real number.

Secondly, you're not trying to prove T(p) = p(f): that's the definition of T. You're trying to prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F.

Finally, F is is not just a set, it's a vector space.
 
To prove that T(p) is a linear transformation, you must show that it has the properties of a linear transformation, that is:
(a) T(a+b)=T(a)+T(b) for a,b in P2
(b) T(ca)=cT(a) for a in P2 and c in R
 
So let p1 and p2 be elements of P2
Then T(p1 + p2) = (p1 + p2)(f) = p1(f) + p2(f) = T(p1) + T(p2)
and T(cp1) = cp1(f) = cT(p1)

Is this sufficient to show that T is a linear transformation or am I leaving something out?
 
That looks right. Good job!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top