Pulley, Ramp with Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a pulley system with two masses and their respective tensions. Key equations include the moment of inertia, torque, and the summation of forces for each mass. There is confusion regarding the correct application of forces, particularly the inclusion of gravitational forces and the direction of acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of consistency in the equations used for both masses to derive accurate values for acceleration and tensions. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of all forces acting on the system to arrive at the correct solution.
kc0ldeah
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/ZkjXv

The given answers are (b) .309 m/s^2 (c) T1= 7.67N, T2=9.22N

Homework Equations



I_disc = .5(mass_disc)r^2
Sum of Torque = I α
a = r α

The Attempt at a Solution



We will define the system moving right and down as positive to get a positive acceleration.

The tension between mass 1 (2kg) and the pulley is T_1
The tension between mass 2 (6kg) and the pulley is T_2

Summation of Torque = I α = rT_2 - rT_1

plug in: α = a/r and I_disc = .5(mass_disc)r^2

into

I α = rT_2 - rT_1

to get

a(.5)(mass_disc) = T_2 - T_1

The summation of the forces in the x-direction for m1 is: F_x = m1(a) = T_1 - μ(m1)g

T_1 = (m1)a + μmg

How do you define the summation of the forces for m2 and get an expression for T_2?

My first attempt:

Sum of Forces for M2 in x direction:

F_x = (m2)a = T_2 - μ(m2)gcos30

T_2 = (m2)a + μ(m2)gcos30

is incorrect. This was done through rotating the system 30 degrees but the summation for mass 1 was not rotated therefore the equations are not consistent and apparently, wrong. What is the best way to do this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.
 
Last edited:
azizlwl said:
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.

The equation you gave for T_2 seems to be incorrect. Plugging in .309 for a yields a T_2 of -.725 which is incorrect
 
Bump? Can anyone give some insight?
 
hi kc0ldeah! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
kc0ldeah said:
F_x = (m2)a = T_2 - μ(m2)gcos30

that's only tension and friction …

what about gravity? :wink:
 
azizlwl said:
T_1-μm_1g=m_1a ...1

m_2Sinθ-μm_2Cosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2

r(T_2-T_1)=Iα...3

3 equations with 3 unknowns- a,T1 and T2
Rotating the system make it more complicated.
You should be consistent with direction of acceleration.

Thousand apologies.
The second equation should be...missing g

m_2gSinθ-μm_2gCosθ-T_2=m_2a ...2
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top