Pure Qubit Question: Does Alice Fulfill Bob's Demand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter begyu85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pure Qubit
begyu85
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

One can describe a pure qubit in two ways (onto the bloch-sphere): 1.) one take a (\alpha,\beta) , where \alpha,\beta are complex numbers and \left|\alpha\right|^{2}+\left|\beta\right|^{2}=1. 2.) with a real 3-dimensional unit vector.

Bob wants that Alice generate one million random (\alpha,\beta) qubit to him. Alice generates rather one million real unit vectors and after this she enumerates this unit vectors to (\alpha,\beta) one by one.

My question is: Did Alice fulfill Bob's demand? Are Bob going to accept Bob's qubits..?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did Alice generate those "random" 3D real unit vectors?
How does Bob generate random alpha beta pairs?
I assume you want uniform coverage of the Bloch sphere in both cases.
If so, Bob should not be able to tell the difference.
Just my $.02

Jim Graber
 
Yes, the distribution of the random qubits is uniform...

My first thought was this what you are saying...but is this answer correct? I mean this would be so simple...

In the first case i will get some statistics, and i have to transform to an other one.. Question: does this transformation (between the representation of the qubits) preserve the features of the statistics... ?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top