QM - Transmission coefficient for square well

AI Thread Summary
A homework problem involves calculating the transmission coefficient for 5 eV electrons encountering a square well of depth 10 eV and width 7.65 * 10^-11 m. The transmission coefficient formula provided is T = [1 + (V0^2 sinh^2(κa) / (4E(V0 - E)))]^-1, with κ^2 defined as (8mπ^2 / h^2)(V0 - E). Initial calculations yielded T = 0.388, but feedback indicated the correct answer should be T = 0.75. The error was traced to a misapplication of the identity for sinh, which was incorrectly noted. After correcting the identity and recalculating, the expected result aligns with the feedback received.
DeltaFunction
Messages
14
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A steady stream of 5 eV electrons impinges on a square well of depth 10 eV. The width of the well is 7.65 * 10^-11 m. What fraction of electrons are transmitted?

Homework Equations


The following equation for the transmission coefficient, T, is given:
T = [1 + \frac{V_0 ^2 sinh^2 κa}{4E(V_0 - E)}]^-1 (**that is meant to be ^-1 for the whole bracket - apologies, this is my first time using LaTex**)
Where κ^2 = \frac{8mπ^2}{h^2}(V_0 - E)

We are also provided with a not-so-subtle hint that sinh~iθ = i~sinh~θ

The Attempt at a Solution



So I have assigned the following values based on the information:

a = 7.65 * 10^-11 m
E = 5 eV
V = - 10 eV
m = 9.11 * 10^-31 kg

It then seems like it should be very straightforward. I calculate ka and found this to be 1.52i. Then using the definition of sinh I calculate sinh^2 κa = -4.73.
Plugging the other values in I arrive at T = 0.388 which seemed reasonable to me, but... The postgrad who marked my work fed back to me that the numerical answer he had was T = 0.75.
I'd be really grateful if someone can check the calculation for me, because it's really bugging me that I can't see my error.
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The h in the denominator for κ2 should be h2, I guess.

I can confirm 1.52i, but if I put this in the final formula I get 0.75.
Well, WolframAlpha does.
 
Thank you, yes it should be h^2, I've now corrected that. I guess I'll go through the figures again carefully :/
 
I've realized my stupid mistake. I copied down the identity incorrectly. A moments thought and I would have seen that sinh~iθ = i~sinh~θ is nonsense :rolleyes: embarrassing
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top