Quantum Computation and Quantum Information

AI Thread Summary
Any qubit can be expressed in the form psi=exp(iγ)[cos(θ/2)0+exp(iΦ)sin(θ/2)1], where the phase factor exp(iγ) is non-observable and can be omitted. This leads to a one-to-one correspondence between qubits and points on the Bloch sphere, with θ and Φ representing spherical coordinates. The normalized state vector can be expressed as |\psi \rangle = a |0\rangle + b|1\rangle, where a and b are complex numbers satisfying a^2 + b^2 = 1. The values of a and b can be represented as r_a = cos(θ/2) and r_b = sin(θ/2), linking the qubit representation to geometric interpretations. The discussion raises a question about the relationship between the radius r_a and the dimensionless quantity cos(θ), highlighting a potential confusion in understanding these concepts.
G.F.Again
Hey all, I'm a beginner of the Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. For a long time, I feel very confuse about the question bellow. Could you do me a favor and show me the proof? Many thanks!
Question:
Show that any qubit can be expressed as
psi=exp(iγ)[cos(θ/2)0+exp(iΦ)sin(θ/2)1]
for real numbers γ,θ and Φ. The phase factor exp(iγ) has no observational effect and can be dropped.
And then show that there is a one to one correspondence between qubits
psi=cos(θ/2)0+exp(iΦ)sin(θ/2)1
and the points on the unit sphere in R(3) called the Bloch sphere, with and as the spherical coordinates of a point of the sphere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by expressing any normalized state vector as |\psi \rangle = a |0\rangle + b|1\rangle, where normalization entails a^2 + b^2 =1. a,b are complex numbers, which can always be expressed as a = r_a e^{i\gamma_a}, b = r_b e^{i\gamma_b}. This means that a^2 + b^2 =r_a^2+r_b^2=1, and since r_a, r_b are positive we can express them as r_a = \cos(\theta /2), r_b= \sin(\theta/2) where 0 \leq \theta \leq \pi. Consequently, we can write |\psi \rangle = \cos(\theta /2) e^{i\gamma_a} |0\rangle + \sin(\theta/2) e^{i\gamma_b} |1\rangle = e^{i\gamma}(\cos(\theta /2)|0\rangle + \sin(\theta/2) e^{i\Phi} |1\rangle ), where \gamma = \gamma_a, \Phi = \gamma_b-\gamma_a.
 
Thank you, Davidk!
 
how is it that you can say r_a = cos (theta/2) when r_a is a radius with a real length and cos(theta) is a dimensionless quantity?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top