Quantum dots Need help in analysis

tghn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Quantum dots! Need help in analysis! :D

hey guys,

so long story short is that I've created gold quantum dots for my uni dissertation. These particles are formed with a protein mesh and been made to not to react with any elements as it's meant to be for human use. These gold quantum dots are being created to be used instead of organic dyes, since they are not prone to photobleaching! Therefore far superior to their counterparts. Further to this they are not toxic. The point of this is to highlight specific parts of the cell for further analysis. Obviously, there are many other uses for them such as quantum dot display, cancer treatment etc. At the moment, I have created single wavelength gold quantum dots with a single electron however if I were to create new gold quantum dots with more electrons, how would this be more advantageous over their single electron counterparts? Would having more electrons therefore mean more discrete energy levels? And therefore can PL at more values of lambda?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
O if you have any question or interested in quantum dots, I will gladly run you through what I've done! Since it's a relatively new tech. I'm actually in the process of perfecting how to make multi wavelength gold quantum dots atm, my previous two attempts have failed due to the 11-MUA not dissolving in ultra pure water (I think).
 
Maybe you could make small lasers.

If this is your research area, shouldn't you already know all of the answers?
 
lol I wish I knew all the answers... Would make life so much easier! I guess that's the beauty of physics - unlimited knowledge to be acquired
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top