Quantum entanglement and relativity of time

B4ssHunter
Messages
178
Reaction score
4
if there are two entangled particles
one of them is flying 80% the speed of light , one of them is on Earth for instance
if we measure the one on Earth , would it the entanglement affect the other particle after sometime * due to time slowing down for speeding up particle * or does it happen instantaneously ?
if the later is true wouldn't that mean that time is not relative ?
or you can take it the other way , if the speeding one at 2 o'clock for instance
would the entanglement appear instantaneously or would it take sometime to appear due to time is slower in the speeding up particle ? so if it takes a second to measure it on the speeding up particle it would take an hour for instance to happen on earth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
253
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
372
Back
Top