A Quantum linear code/ Dual Code (CSS) proof

steve1763
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
What would the proof be for the following identity? I cannot find the proof anywhere
Screenshot 2021-09-05 at 21.52.33.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How should we know, what your symbols mean? You have to give a bit more information or a link to the paper you are referring too.
 
If ##x\in C^\perp## then it is clear. If not, then there is a ##c_0\in C## such that ##x\cdot c_0 =1##. The you have

##
-1\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=(-1)^{x\cdot c_0}\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot (c-c_0)}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}
##

The last equality is because ##C## is a subspace.
 
Last edited:
martinbn said:
If ##x\in C^\perp## then it is clear. If not, then there is a ##c_0\in C## such that ##x\cdot c_0 =1##. The you have

##
-1\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=(-1)^{x\cdot c}\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot (c-c_0)}=\sum_{c\in C}(-1)^{x\cdot c}
##

The last equality is because ##C## is a subspace.
Thank you very much
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top