Quantum mechanics basic question on azimuthal wave function.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the azimuthal wave function for an electron in a hydrogen atom, specifically addressing the magnetic quantum number, ml. Participants are exploring whether the solution involves the radial equation or variable separation. It is established that the wave function must have a single value for any angle φ, emphasizing continuity and differentiability. One user attempts to differentiate the wave function, resulting in ml = 1/i, but struggles to demonstrate that ml can only take integer values. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer connection between the mathematical approach and the quantum mechanical implications of ml.
Aerozeppelin
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Applly conditions to azimuthal wave function for an electron in the hydrogen atom to show that ml, the magnetic quantum number, can take on any integer value.

See attachment for actual question.


Homework Equations



I'm pretty stuck, is it something to do with the radial equation? Or separating variables?

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 740
Physics news on Phys.org
An acceptable wave function can only have a single value for any given angle ##\phi##.
 
Yes, because it is continuous with respect to the variable, and its derivate.

So, would you suggest differentiating the wave function and letting the derivative equal the original wavefunction?


I tried this and got:

ml = \frac{1}{i}

But I don't see how this shows that ml can only take the integer values?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top