Quantum Mechanics: Expected momentum of a real wavefunction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the expected momentum <p> for a given wavefunction, \psi(x) = Cx for 0 < x < 10. The normalization constant C was found to be \sqrt{3/1000}, and the expected position <x> was calculated as 30/4. The confusion arises in determining <p>, with the integral yielding a purely imaginary result, leading to the conclusion that <p> must be zero since momentum is a real observable. Ultimately, the consensus is that the integration limits affect the result, confirming that <p> = 0.
galaxyrocker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the wavefunction, \psi(x) = Cx for 0 < x < 10 and \psi(x) = 0 for all other values.

What is the normalization constant of C? I got \sqrt{3/1000}.
What is <x>? I got 30/4.
What is <p>? Here is where I'm confused.

Homework Equations


\langle p \rangle = C^2 \frac{\hbar}{i} \int_0^{10} \psi^* \frac{d}{dx} \psi \, dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I worked out the integral, and got (3/20)(\hbar/i).

It's here that I can't figure out whether to leave it as that, or say it's 0, since the momentum is an observable, and must be real. I realize that the function is odd, but I'm not integrating it from -a to a, which means I can't just say it's 0 for that reason.

[strike]PS: Sorry for my horrible usage of LaTeX.[/strike]
Mod note: Fixed your LaTeX for you.[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try integrating by parts. Also, your notation is not good. You already pulled the C's out of the integral so it should be \langle p \rangle = C^2 \frac{\hbar}{i} \int_0^{10} x \frac{d}{dx} x \, dxNVM the above ;(. Think about it. You know that <p> is real and you get a purely imaginary result. What can you conclude? ;)
 
Last edited:
I conclude that I am either wrong, or that <p> = 0. I'm inclined to the former, but the latter makes sense, because if I was integrating around the origin (say, from -5 to 5 instead), it would cancel.
 
galaxyrocker said:
I conclude that I am either wrong, or that <p> = 0. I'm inclined to the former, but the latter makes sense, because if I was integrating around the origin (say, from -5 to 5 instead), it would cancel.

But your integral goes from 0 to 10, so <p> = 0.
 
Marioqwe said:
But your integral goes from 0 to 10, so <p> = 0.

Yes.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top