Quantum physics time evolution of an overlap

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quantum physics problem related to the time evolution of a wave function under a conserved Hamiltonian. The user initially struggles with part (b) of the homework, attempting to apply the Schrödinger equation but finds it unhelpful for connecting to the uncertainty of the Hamiltonian. They explore dimensional analysis and the uncertainty formula for energy, indicating a need for a second-order term in their calculations. After incorporating the second term, clarity on how to proceed with the solution emerges. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between wave function evolution and energy uncertainty in quantum mechanics.
Monci
Messages
8
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


[/B]
I'm trying to solve the following problem. (a) was easy but I am stuck at (b).
Quantum.png


Homework Equations


[/B]
Since we are told that the Hamiltonian is conserved, and the answer is in terms of the uncertainty of H, I assume I have to use the conservation of uncertainty. Maybe I could use the Schrödinger equation to see how time affects the wave function.

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the Schrödinger equation I have $$\psi (t) = \psi (0) + \frac{1}{i\hbar}H\psi(0)t + O(t^2)$$
However I don't find this particularly useful since I can't get from here to the uncertainty of H easily. I have tried the case with just two states but didn't accomplish anything. Dimensional analysis suggests something like $$ 1 - \frac{\Delta H^2}{\hbar^2}dt^2 + O(t^3) $$
I have no idea how to proceed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You also need the 2nd order term
$$
-\frac{H^2t^2}{\hbar}\psi(0)
$$
May be the problem asks you to make use of the uncertainty formula for energy ##\Delta H^2 = \langle H^2\rangle - \langle H\rangle ^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes Monci
blue_leaf77 said:
You also need the 2nd order term
$$
-\frac{H^2t^2}{\hbar}\psi(0)
$$
May be the problem asks you to make use of the uncertainty formula for energy ##\Delta H^2 = \langle H^2\rangle - \langle H\rangle ^2##.
Thank you. Once I added the second term it was very clear how I should proceed.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top