Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)

  • Thread starter Thread starter randomuser1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the isentropic relationship PV^gamma = constant, which is derived under the assumption of quasi-equilibrium or reversible processes. It is clarified that this relationship should only apply to isentropic processes, which are both adiabatic and reversible, rather than to all adiabatic processes. Participants express concern over online resources that use the isentropic equation for adiabatic processes without emphasizing the need for reversibility. The consensus is that the term "isentropic" inherently indicates constant entropy, thus implying reversibility. Misinterpretations in educational materials may lead to confusion regarding the conditions under which PV^gamma applies.
randomuser1
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes?

However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/adiab.html#c3 case in point, using PV^gamma = constant for adiabatic process. My suspicion in that in these sources, when they say adiabatic, they really mean isentropic?

Thanks. Also, not sure if this is the right area to post this but yea...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are correct, it does not apply to adiabatic, irreversible processes. But that's kind built right into the word itself: isentropic. That implies the process must be constant-entropy, i.e., reversible.

I don't immediately know why the site you link is using it without specifying the reversibility condition.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller and randomuser1

Thread '2:1 Pulley Question'

I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
View full post »

Thread 'Why do all my clocks run slow?'

Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
View full post »

Similar threads

I How can a process be isentropic but not reversible or adiobatic?
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Graphical difference between adiabatic and isothermal processes.
Replies
1
Views
3K
Chemistry Calculation of thermodynamic variables for irreversible adiabatic process of ideal gas
Replies
9
Views
2K
PV^lamba=constant in an isentropic Flow
Replies
7
Views
2K
Adiabatic expansion with temperature-dependent gamma
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Irreversible adiabatic processes & entropy change (clarification needed)
Replies
22
Views
5K
Show that ##pV^\gamma## is a constant for an adiabatic process
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is PV^gamma Constant in Adiabatic Processes?
Replies
9
Views
5K
Reversible adiabatic expansion -- calculate change in E
Replies
8
Views
2K
How to derive pv^gamma=constant
Replies
4
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top