Question about magnetic field gradients

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the magnetic field gradient for an anti-Helmholtz configuration requires consideration of various factors, including coil radius and separation distance. Incorporating the thickness of the coil wire is crucial due to its impact on resistance and heat generation. Determining the required field strength and gradient over a specific volume is essential for establishing current needs. Once these parameters are defined, one can assess the potential heating of the windings and decide on appropriate wire size and cooling methods. Understanding these elements will guide the design and dimensions of the coil effectively.
Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I am trying to calculate the magnetic field gradient for an anti-Helmholtz configuration. All the equations I have seen simply relate the strength of the gradient to some rudimentary variables (coil radius, separation distance of coils, etc.) but I am also interested in incorporating the thickness of the coil wire itself (especially considering the effect of resistance and great power that will heat up the coil). This is important for my choice and dimensions of coil. Does anybody know what kind of equation would include the latter properties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually, the dimensions of the coil are dictated by the working volume needed for your application. The first questions you need to ask is how strong a field you need and what kind of gradient must it have over what volume. Once you answer these questions, then you will have a good idea of the current requirements. You can calculate how hot the windings might get given that current and then worry about the size of wire you need and the whether you should figure out a way to cool the coil.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top