Question about Plasma Ball (can I leave it running all night?)

AI Thread Summary
Leaving a plasma ball on all night is generally not recommended, as many users report that theirs burned out after extended use. The devices are often cheaply made and may not withstand prolonged operation. It is advisable to turn off the plasma ball when not in use to avoid potential damage. Higher quality versions may be available from specialized suppliers, which could offer better durability. Overall, caution is advised regarding continuous use of plasma balls.
Gerald71
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there! I wanted to know if i can leave the Plasm Ball turned on all night in my room without any problem.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Purely anecdotal but mine burned out.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes sophiecentaur and Keith_McClary
Paul Colby said:
Purely anecdotal but mine burned out.
Mine too!
Probably best to have it turned off when you are not watching it. These things are mostly cheaply produced and should be treated accordingly. There may be high quality versions available - perhaps from theatrical lighting suppliers who have to sell stuff that works for ever.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A strict proof of "why the Earth is a ball"
Replies
23
Views
2K
I Metal Ball Rolling in a Parabolic Bowl in the presence of a magnet
Replies
1
Views
1K
Pool Ball Physics: Questions on Impact Spins
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Rolling balls with different rotational inertia
Replies
14
Views
2K
B Understanding Physics for Coding Collision of 2 Balls
Replies
14
Views
3K
What causes a basketball to leave the ground after bouncing?
Replies
22
Views
5K
I [Questions] Modeling a Baseball Pitch Trajectory in 3D Space
Replies
1
Views
2K
B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
Can a Spinning Astronaut Use a Tethered Bowling Ball to Gain Motion in Space?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Getting into Plasma Physics and Fusion
Replies
3
Views
361

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top