Question about transverese-traceless gauge in gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neitrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauge Gravity
Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I have a question about gauges in gravity.
Symmetric tensor field in four dimensions has 10 independet components, when we want to describe massless spin-two field (graviton) we impose harmonic gauge which reduces 10 independet components to 6 and afterwards we use diff invariance and eventually go down from 6 to 2 independet components. And all this happens with harmonic gauge.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What is a transverse-traceless gauge?
Transverese means d_mu (h_mu_nu)=0 and this puts constraints on 4 components out of initial 10 components of symmetric tensor...
Traceless means Tr (h_mu_nu)=0 and this puts constraint on 1 component...
So TT gauge puts constraints 5 constraints on 10 components of symmetric tensor field... and what to do next how to reduce to 2 components to describe graviton ... how do i cast TT gauge in the same sense as i did for harmonic gauge above... ?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neitrino, As you say, the first step is to impose the harmonic gauge condition, hμν,ν = 0, or equivalently in momentum space, hμνkν = 0. This can be done covariantly, and reduces the number of independent components from 10 to 6.

There remains the freedom of further gauge transformations, hμν → hμν + ekν). These can be used to reduce the number of components from 6 to 2, but not in a Lorentz covariant manner. Choosing a rest frame, one can show it is possible to set hi0 = 0 and hij = 0. Then we also have hijkj = 0. This is what we mean by transverse and traceless, namely transverse to the 3-dimensional k-vector.
 
Thanks Bill_K for you help...

So is it (TT gauge) much the same as Coulomb gauge in vector field theory ?


Thanks
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top