Question reguarding superpostion

  • Thread starter Thread starter livethere
  • Start date Start date
livethere
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This post will be using assumptions that are within the Copenhagen interpretation.

If I understand decoherence, the superposition of the wave function will crash upon interacting with a microscopic system.
However what really constitutes as a superposition interacting with a system? I thought that superpositions were spread out everywhere, and so shouldn't the wave functions be constantly collapsing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
livethere said:
If I understand decoherence, the superposition of the wave function will crash upon interacting with a microscopic system.

It gets converted to a mixed state.

livethere said:
However what really constitutes as a superposition interacting with a system? I thought that superpositions were spread out everywhere, and so shouldn't the wave functions be constantly collapsing?

What happens is the state, when expanded in terms of position eigenstates (these are simply states of definite position), is called a wave-function. In that form it is a superposition of position. But it needs to be stressed its in a superposition of all sorts of other things as well. The reason its usually done that way is so the usual form Schroedinger's Equation can be used - that requires states to be in the form of wave-functions.

Quantum objects interact via what's called their Hamiltonian. Mostly that Hamiltonian has radial symmetry - meaning its the same regardless of how you orientate you coordinate system. It can be shown that leads to the position basis being singled out during that interaction (that's what decoherence is - an interaction) and the state after interaction is in a mixed state of position eigenstates.

Thanks
Bill
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top