MHB Question: What is the value of ⌊ 2020/(1+2+3+...+2019)⌋?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The value of ⌊ 2020/(1+2+3+...+2019)⌋ is derived from analyzing the factorials involved. The discussion outlines a method to express n! in terms of sums of factorials, leading to inequalities that help establish bounds. It concludes that for n ≥ 4, the relationship holds that n! is greater than a certain sum of factorials. By applying this reasoning specifically for n = 2010, the final result is determined to be 2018. Thus, the value of the original expression is 2018.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Finding value of $\displaystyle \bigg\lfloor \frac{2020!}{1!+2!+3!+\cdots +2019!}\bigg\rfloor$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My attempt:
For $n > 2$ the following is true:

\[F_n = \left \lfloor \frac{(n+1)!}{1!+2!+3!+...+n!} \right \rfloor = n-1\]

Proof by induction:
Base cases:
\[F_3 =\left \lfloor \frac{4!}{1!+2!+3!} \right \rfloor = \left \lfloor \frac{24}{9} \right \rfloor = 2. \\\\ F_4 = \left \lfloor \frac{5!}{1!+2!+3!+4!} \right \rfloor = \left \lfloor \frac{120}{33} \right \rfloor = 3.\]

Suppose the identity holds for some n = m > 4. We need to show, that the identity also holds for n = m+1.

We have the identity: \[ F_m =\left \lfloor \frac{(m+1)!}{1!+2!+3!+...+m!} \right \rfloor = m-1.\]

To ease the algebra, let \[\sigma = 1!+2!+3!+...+m!\]

Then, we can write:

\[F_{m+1}=\left \lfloor \frac{(m+2)!}{1!+2!+3!+...+(m+1)!} \right \rfloor \\\\ =\left \lfloor \frac{(m+1)!}{\sigma +(m+1)!}(m+2) \right \rfloor\\\\ =\left \lfloor \frac{\frac{(m+1)!}{\sigma }}{1+\frac{(m+1)!}{\sigma }}(m+2) \right \rfloor\]

We know, that \[\frac{(m+1)!}{\sigma } = m-1+\varepsilon\] for some $0< \varepsilon<1$.

In other words: \[F_{m+1} =\left \lfloor \frac{m-1+\varepsilon }{m + \varepsilon }(m+2) \right \rfloor =\left \lfloor \left ( 1-\frac{1}{m+\varepsilon } \right )(m+2) \right \rfloor\]

Now, the fraction $\frac{m+2}{m+\varepsilon}$ has the sharp limits: \[1 < \frac{m+2}{m+\varepsilon } <2\]

This follows from the inequalities: $\varepsilon < 2 < m +2\varepsilon$

Thus the fraction can be written as: $\frac{m+2}{m+\varepsilon} = 1+\delta$ for some $0 < \delta < 1$.
Finally, we get

\[F_{m+1} =\left \lfloor m+2- (1+\delta )\right \rfloor = \left \lfloor m \right \rfloor+\left \lfloor 1-\delta \right \rfloor = m.\] q.e.d.- and we conclude, that $F_{2019}= 2018.$
 
Thanks Ifdahl for nice solution

Here is mine

[sp]Using $n!=n(n-1)! = [(n-1)+1](n-1)! = (n-1)(n-1)!+(n-1)(n-2)!$

So $(n-1)(n-1)!+(n-1)(n-2)!<(n-1)(n-1)!+(n-1)(n-2)!+(n-1)(n-3)!+\cdots (n-1)1!\;\forall n\geq 4$

So $n!<(n-1)\bigg[(n-1)!+(n-2)!+(n-3)!+\cdots +2!+1!\bigg]\cdots \cdots (1)$

And $n!=n(n-1)!=[(n-2)+2](n-1)!=(n-2)(n-1)!+2(n-1)!=(n-2)(n-1)!+2(n-1)(n-2)!$

So $n!=(n-2)(n-1)!+(n-2)(n-2)!+n(n-2)(n-3)!$

As $n(n-3)!>(n-3)!+(n-4)!+\cdots +2!+1!\forall n\geq 4$

So $n(n-2)(n-3)!>(n-2)\bigg[(n-3)!+(n-4)!+\cdots +2!+1!\bigg]$

So $n!>(n-2)\bigg[(n-1)!+(n-2)!+\cdots\cdots +2!+1!\bigg]\cdots \cdots (2)$

From $(1)$ and $(2),$ We have

$\displaystyle (n-2)<\frac{n!}{1!+2!+3!+\cdots \cdots +(n-1)!}<(n-1)$

So we get $\displaystyle \bigg\lfloor \frac{n!}{1!+2!+3!+\cdots \cdots +(n-1)!}\bigg \rfloor =(n-2)$

Now put $n=2010,$ We get $\displaystyle \bigg\lfloor \frac{2020!}{1!+2!+3!+\cdots \cdots +2019!}\bigg \rfloor =2018$[/sp]
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top