- #141
LowlyPion
Homework Helper
- 3,128
- 6
I'd say the arguments against McCain and Obama not being eligible due to citizenship requirements are a bit specious. The apparent preponderance of interpretation surely lies with McCain and Obama both qualifying as Citizens under the original meaning and intent of the Constitution and current US Law.
Article II Section 1 doesn't exactly specify a US soil requirement as an eligibility requirement.
The US Naturalization Law of 1790 went on to state:
Current law today embodied in Title 8, Section 1401, defines citizens at birth as among other eligibilities:
Article II Section 1 doesn't exactly specify a US soil requirement as an eligibility requirement.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.htmlUS_Constitution said:No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; ...
The US Naturalization Law of 1790 went on to state:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=227US_Congress_March_26_1790 said:And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.
Current law today embodied in Title 8, Section 1401, defines citizens at birth as among other eligibilities:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html8_USC_1401_c said:(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;