Questions in linear motion and rotating motion

In summary: I am sorry I cannot access it.When the acceleration changes from any value to any value in questions like these, you have to remember that the final velocity of the first part will be the initial velocity of the second part. That is why you use two separate equations for each part.In summary, the conversation is discussing a physics problem involving a car stopping and a question about rotational velocity. The answer is provided through equations and graphical representation methods.
  • #1
manal950
177
0
Hi

please I want from you check my answer

http://store2.up-00.com/May12/Ueu86896.jpg

http://store2.up-00.com/May12/fkl86896.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
manal950 said:
Hi

please I want from you check my answer
[/PLAIN]

In this case the equation
V2=u2+2as
means that the square of the final velocity equal the square of the initial velocity plus two times the stopping acceleration time the distance over which the car stopped. Think through the question and see that the car does not accelerate over a distance of 60 m.

If you substitute the correct distance, you'll get the correct answer.
 
  • #3
But how I can know the total distance where the car stop
 
  • #4
Yes, you do. You are told that the driver sees a person 60 m ahead of him. You are also told the he continues at 20m/s for 1.5 s before braking. At 20 m/s he will go (20)(1.5)= 30 m in 1.5 seconds. He has the remaining 60- 30= 30 m in which to stop.
 
  • #5
You are using the same variables, s and t, for given values and required values.
You should consider what is meant by delay.
 
  • #6
1 )

u = 20
V = 0
s = 30 m

a ) V^2 = u^2 + 2as
0 = 20^2 + 2 X a X 30
a = -6.6

time requried

V = u + at
t = 3 s

now distance

s = ut + 1/2 a t^2
s = 20 X(3) + 1/2 X(-6.6) X 3^2
s = 30 m

uniform accleration = a = -6.6
 
  • #7
manal950 said:
1 )

u = 20
V = 0
s = 30 m

a ) V^2 = u^2 + 2as
0 = 20^2 + 2 X a X 30
a = -6.6

Correct except the answer rounds to -6.7 m/s2
time requried

V = u + at
t = 3 s
Correct.

now distance

s = ut + 1/2 a t^2
s = 20 X(3) + 1/2 X(-6.6) X 3^2
s = 30 m

uniform accleration = a = -6.6

Yes, but you have already calculated ( or, rather, HallsofIvy calculated) how far the car takes to stop. You did not need to do it again.
 
  • #8
thank sou much what about second one ...
 
  • #9
manal950 said:
thank sou much what about second one ...

I am wrestling with the wording a little...You have correctly calculated the average rotational velocity as 20 rad/s for the first 10 seconds. The given information says the next eight seconds has a lower average rotational speed. In other words, there was a negative acceleration, so your answer that angular acceleration is zero is not correct.

What bugs me here is that you can find an average rotational velocity from t=10 s to
t =18 s, but acceleration should be calculated from instantaneous velocities. I am guess you are expected to figure that the average rotational velocity occurs at the center of each interval...
 
  • #10
Conceptualize.
If a diagram is not provided, you should almost always make a quick drawing of the situation.
Shouldn't rely on equations for plug and chug.

For a constant acceleration kinematic, you should be able to draw and interpret a velocity-time diagram.
 
  • #11
Can I do by this
Q = w0t + 1/2 at^2
200 = 10W0 + 50a ====== first equation Q = w0t + 1/2 at^2
100 =8w0 + 32a ======== second equation

200 = 10W0 + 50a
100 =8w0 + 32a
-------------------------
100 = 2W0 + 18a is this correct until now ?
 
  • #12
Segment #2
Constant velocity->8 secs -> 100reve.
Constant velocity?
Equation?

Segment #1
Constant acceleration ->10 secs -> 200 rev.
Equation?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
see the Q2 ... It want initial velocity during the acceleration was constant and after change to the a = 0 as the velocity is constant

now I will ask is the initial velocity depend for constant acceleration or from it was constant to changed .

if the initial velocity depend only to first rev that mean
w = w0 + at
w = 20 rad/s
but now we have 2 variable a and w0

How I can get one of them ?
 
  • #14
What is the value of constant velocity?

This value is the v of constant acceleration.

s=ut+1/2at2
a=(v-u)/t

s=ut+1/2t2(v-u)/t

2s=2ut + vt-ut

u=(2s-vt)/t
 
Last edited:
  • #15
constant velocity is 12.5 rad/s
 
  • #16
OMG ! from where you got this equations

We learn only 3 equation
w = w0 + at
w2 = w0^2 + 2sQ
Q = W0t + 1/2 at^2

I am confusing ??
 
  • #17
These 2 are standard.
s=ut+1/2at2 ...(1)
a=(v-u)/t ...(2)

Now you substitute "a" in equation (1)
And you get
s=ut+1/2t2(v-u)/t

Just replace the translational variables with rotational variables.
u ->ω0
v ->ω1
a ->α
s->θ
 
Last edited:
  • #18
why substitute ... why we don't take value for each variables ..

w = w0 + at
a = (12.5 - 20 ) 8
= -0.935is correct ..?
 
  • #19
ω1=12.5 -Correct.
Where do get the value ω0=20?

Now we are talking on acceleration NOT equal to zero.
 
  • #20
12.5 - 20 / 18

a =-0.4

is correct ?

give me the way to find a ? ??
 
  • #21
is the final answer for a = - 1.5 and velocity = 2.7 ?
 
  • #22
Graphical representation might help you to understand.
Note the object state from 1->2->3

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8412/p1010010je.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
But is the final answer for a = - 1.5 rad/s^2 and velocity = 2.7 rad/s?
 
  • #24
manal950 said:
But is the final answer for a = - 1.5 rad/s^2 and velocity = 2.7 rad/s?

Acceleration is correct. Check the velocity.
 
  • #25
ok I got the answer 27... thaaaaaaaank.. can help my to draw for this
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread ... 611&page=2

and it same way to solve that Q and this one ...

and can give me all steps to solve like this Q (In fact I face only problem in like this Q when the acceleration change ex was constant change to zero )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
manal950 said:
can help my to draw for this
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread ... 611&page=2

That link is not opening for me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Questions in linear motion and rotating motion

What is linear motion?

Linear motion refers to the movement of an object in a straight line, where the object travels the same distance in the same direction over a period of time.

What is rotational motion?

Rotational motion is the movement of an object around an axis or center point, such as a spinning top or the rotation of the Earth around the sun.

What are the differences between linear and rotational motion?

The main difference between linear and rotational motion is the direction of movement. Linear motion occurs in a straight line, while rotational motion occurs around an axis. Additionally, linear motion involves displacement, velocity, and acceleration, while rotational motion involves angular displacement, angular velocity, and angular acceleration.

How are linear and rotational motion related?

Linear and rotational motion are related through the concept of torque, which is the force that causes an object to rotate. When a force is applied to an object at a distance from its center of mass, it creates a torque that causes rotational motion.

What are some real-life examples of linear and rotational motion?

Examples of linear motion include a car driving in a straight line, a roller coaster going down a hill, or a person running. Examples of rotational motion include a spinning top, a merry-go-round, or the rotation of a ceiling fan.

Similar threads

Back
Top