Quick Question - Explain Work Energy Concept

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the work-kinetic energy theorem to determine the force needed to accelerate an electron from rest to a specified speed over a given distance. Participants clarify that work is defined as the change in kinetic energy, which can be expressed through the equation W = Fx. The confusion arises from understanding why W must equal Fx when the kinetic energy formula K = 1/2 mv^2 provides the necessary information. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that while the kinetic energy can be calculated, the force is derived from the work-energy relationship. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
physicsmarkb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[Solved] Quick Question - Explain Work Energy Concept

Homework Statement



Use the work - kinetic energy theorem to find the force required to accelerate an electron (m = 9.11 x 10^-31 kg) from rest to a speed of 1.50 x 10^7 m/s in a distance of .0125 m.


Homework Equations


W = Fx cos(theta), K = 1/2 mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I would set Fx cos(theta) = 1/2 mv^2 and then solve for F but I don't understand why I would do this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anyone know why I have have to solve it like this?
 
work = the change in kinetic energy, in other words the final kinetic energy - the initial kinetic energy. The electron starts from rest and has no initial kinetic energy. That pretty much IS the work-energy theorem

Make sure you understand what work is, it's how much energy you're going to impart to the electron, and you know what final kinetic energy you would like the electron to have
 
So with K final, all you have is mass and velocity. With W = Fx, you have force and distance. Why do you divide mass and velocity by distance?
Edit: I just realized that you divide because you're trying to solve for F.

What I still don't understand is that why you have all the information for K = 1/2 mv^2 which is W = K but that doesn't work. I don't get why you have to set it equal to W = Fx.
 
Last edited:
What I still don't understand is that why you have all the information for K = 1/2 mv^2 which is W = K but that doesn't work. I don't get why you have to set it equal to W = Fx.

Well with W=K and knowing K, you would've found work. Were you looking for work? No. Can you use the definition of work to find force? Yes. And that's what you did
 
blochwave said:
Well with W=K and knowing K, you would've found work. Were you looking for work? No. Can you use the definition of work to find force? Yes. And that's what you did

Wow I'm so dumb. I can't believe I wasn't paying attention to W and F.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top