Quick question: Momentum operator in QM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the two forms of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics, p = (-i hbar d/dx) and p = (hbar / i)d/dx, and how to derive one from the other. Participants explore the mathematical properties of the imaginary unit, particularly the confusion surrounding the squaring of -i and its implications for the equivalence of the two expressions. The conversation highlights that (-i)^2 equals -1, which leads to a misunderstanding when attempting to equate the squared forms of the momentum operators. Clarifications are provided on the manipulation of complex numbers and their exponential forms to resolve the issue. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles in quantum mechanics.
Libohove90
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are two ways to write the momentum operator, p = (-i hbar d/dx) and p = (hbar / i)d/dx. How do you go from one to the other?

Homework Equations



The two I gave above.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to see if -ih = h/i by squaring both sides, but one came out positive and the other negative. Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-i^2 = 1, not -1. This makes (-i hbar)^2 not equivalent to (hbar / i)^2
 
Last edited:
Since when did (-i)^2 = 1?
 
Libohove90 said:
-i^2 = 1, not -1. This makes (-i hbar)^2 not equivalent to (hbar / i)^2

(-i)^2 = (-1)^2(i)^2
 
i^{-1} =- i
Why?
<br /> i^{-1} = e^{-ln(i)}=e^{-ln(e^{i\pi /2})}=e^{-i\pi /2}=-i<br />
since e^{\pm i\pi /2}= cos(\pm\pi /2) + isin(\pm\pi /2)=\pm i
 
Or you just multiply 1/i by i/i to get i/i^2 = i/(-1) = -i.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top