Radiation calculation confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around converting exposure rates from mGy/h to becquerels for a 137Cs source, with an exposure rate of 2.50 mGy/h at one meter. The original poster expresses confusion about the conversion process, noting that mGy and becquerels measure different aspects of radiation. They seek clarification on whether a direct conversion is possible or if it requires multiple intermediary units. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in radiation calculations and the need for a clearer understanding of the relationship between exposure and activity. Ultimately, the challenge lies in accurately translating these different radiation metrics.
murdrobe
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6. If the exposure rate from 137Cs at one metre is 2.50 mGy/h, how many bequerels are present?

Homework Equations



Exposure is a quantity that expresses the radiation delivered to a point at a certain distance.

I1d12 = I2d22
I1 = the radiation intensity at distance d1 from the radiation source.
d1 = the shorter distance from the source where the radiation intensity is I1.
I2 = the radiation intensity at distance d2 from the radiation source.
d2 = the longer distance from the source where the radiation intensity is I2.

I1 I2
source* ------------>|----------> |
------------>| |
d1 d2




The Attempt at a Solution



my issue is that it seems we are being asked to convert miliGrays to becquerels and I am not sure how that's done, they seem to be a measure of different things from what i was taught so surely a conversion will be imperfect?

from looking around on the internet, it seems possible but via conversion through several intermediatry units. is that how this is meant to be achieved or is there a simpler method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*shameless bump*

this 1 has stumped me a little sorry.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top