Radiowaves bouncing off of ionosphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swankie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionosphere
AI Thread Summary
The minimum wavelength that can effectively bounce off the ionosphere ranges from approximately 10 kHz to 50 MHz, with 80 MHz being a general cutoff frequency for reflection. Frequencies above 100 MHz tend to penetrate the ionosphere, utilizing methods like tropospheric ducting for long-distance propagation. Handheld receivers capable of picking up 150 MHz exist, such as the AOR AR 8200 MK3, which can connect to external antennas for better reception. The angle of reflection changes significantly as frequency increases, particularly between 30 MHz and 70 MHz. Additionally, signals can reflect off auroral curtains, resulting in distorted audio, especially at higher frequencies.
Swankie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What is about the minimum wavelength that can bounce off of the ionosphere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi swankie

anything from ~10kHz to ~ 50MHz ( 50MHz = 6metre wavelength) will easily reflect off the Ionosphere using either the D, E or F layers

frequencies from ~ 100MHz (3 metres) and up will tend to easily penetrate the Ionosphere. Those higher frequencies, right up into the microwave bands, at least up to 24 GHz (1.2cm) can use tropospheric ducting and other methods of long haul propagation

so as a generalisation, approx 80MHz (3.75 metre wavelength) would be the cutoff freq for Ionospheric reflection.
I have seen/used sporadic E layer propagation up to 150MHz, but relatively rare

cheers
Dave
 
Thanks, Dave! Great answer! Do you know of any handheld receivers that could pick up 150MHz? Or would you need something w/ a larger antenna?
 
Swankie said:
Thanks, Dave! Great answer! Do you know of any handheld receivers that could pick up 150MHz? Or would you need something w/ a larger antenna?

There are a number of scanning receivers that cover 150MHz and a wide range of freq's either side.
for example the AOR range of receivers ... the AR 8200 MK3, that I have covers, 500kHz to 2050MHz pretty much contineously. Its a very versatile receiver and altho comes with a "rubber duckie" antenna, the receiver can be connected to a decent external antenna.

Just a comment about reflection off the ionosphere. the lower VLF and HF frequencies say 100 kHz to 30MHz the angle of reflection can be quite sharp but as the frequency increases from ~ 30MHz up to ~ 70 MHz the angle changes substantially, see my drawings below...

attachment.php?attachmentid=47582&stc=1&d=1337860294.gif


NOTE as said in image ... NOT to scale, just a basic pic to give you an idea and something to base further info searching on :smile:

the lowest layer is the D layer good for 10kHz to 1MHz (not shown in image)
Then the E layer, then the F1 and F2 layers being the highest up
I won't go into individual descriptions here, there's plenty of info on the www
depending on the time of day and also year the F1 and F2 layers will split into the 2 layers and then recombine into a single F layer
You can see the really low angle of propagation of the radio signal off the E layer

On all layers you can get single hop of signals as I have shown, and you can also get multi-hop of signals too. I have had multi-hop propagation on the 50 MHz (6 metre) ham radio band on a number of times.

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • ionosphere.GIF
    ionosphere.GIF
    5.5 KB · Views: 1,790
As you dig into some studies on the subject, you will find a lot of discussion on what is theorized to be happening in the ionosphere when a radio signal encounters it.
eg... does the signal reflect directly off the layer at the point of contact. Or is there a degree of refraction that causes the signal to follow the layer for a distance before coming back out and down to the ground.
There's a whole mass of physics way over my head, describing the maths of these interactions.

There is one form of ionospheric propagation that I haven't commented on yet.
That is the reflection of a radio signal off an auroral curtain. I have done that on the 50 MHz and the 144 MHz frequencies. Because the aurora has a lot of movement in it, the audio signals are readable but quite distorted and the distortion is worse as the freq increases.

attachment.php?attachmentid=47583&stc=1&d=1337862913.gif


This is also referred to auroral backscatter ... now the drawing below (again, not to scale) that the signal from station B is going out to the auroral curtain and then being reflected back over the top and on to station A. This was what it was like for me when I lived in southern New Zealand. I was in the station B position in Dunedin city and my signals were being backscattered back over the top of me to station A in Christchurch city.
and of course for us in the southern hemisphere the aurora was south of us. It is reversed for those in the northern hemisphere

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • Aurora Reflection.GIF
    Aurora Reflection.GIF
    2.2 KB · Views: 1,512
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top