Random Photos

[DennisN]

Flag time... I was down at a marina on a windy day and happened to shoot some flags.
Do you know them?

Spoiler

Germany.

Spoiler

Netherlands.

Spoiler

Denmark.

Spoiler

Sweden.

Spoiler

Norway.

Spoiler

EU (European Union).

 

[Ibix]

I got $(5+i)/6$. I carelessly said France instead of the Netherlands, but since I'm only out by 90° I claim $i$ points for that.

 

[pinball1970]

Flag time... I was down at a marina on a windy day and happened to shoot some flags.
Do you know them?

Spoiler

Germany.

View attachment 327367

That is Navy not black?

 

[pinball1970]

I totally messed that up but that stripe is not black in the German flag.

 

[DennisN]

I totally messed that up but that stripe is not black in the German flag.

I didn't pay attention to the actual color when I was there.
Maybe it looks dark blue on that photo due to partial transparency of the flag (i.e. the light from the blue background sky comes partly through, just a guess), and/or I did something weird when I edited in Photoshop .

Here's another photo with four of the flags from another angle:

It looks at least to me like the flags are partially transparent.

 

[DennisN]

Summer is here, so here are some plants:

Yellow roses:

Flowering bush (Spirea):

Yellow flowers on a tree:
(Google picture search says the species is golden chain (Laburnum anagyroides))

(Lens used (all three photos): Yashinon-DS 50mm f/1.9)

 

[morrobay]

 

[nsaspook]

18 years old ...

 

[DennisN]

A lovely redstart singing a tune in the afternoon:

 

[Rive]

When you make a bunch of photos of a noisy hole on a tree, some of them are bound to be lucky, right?

This harmless looking plant has quite an epic name: might be translated as 'scythe-bane', I think...

After rain

I did not dare to bring any decent gear to that hike, and I was sooo right

 

[DennisN]

When you make a bunch of photos of a noisy hole on a tree, some of them are bound to be lucky, right?

Lovely!

I recently have been experimenting with shooting flying birds, so I'd like to share a friendly suggestion:

(caveat: I don't know what kind of camera you are using, i.e. mobile phone, compact camera or system camera, but the suggestion below assumes you are using a camera that can be set manually.)

If you would like to try to get less motion blur from a flying bird (or anything else moving), do this:

Decrease the exposure time/shutter speed to ca 1/1000 sec (or less; less is even better).

Such a short exposure time will make the photos darker, so compensate by increasing ISO to let's say somewhere between ISO 1000 - 2500 (ca, your mileage may vary).

 

[Rive]

Thanks: will try.
We have upgraded to a real camera just recently - still learning it, though - but it was a dark (really dark!) forest on the darker side of a hill, with only the basic (cheap) zoom optics...
So at the end I think I've already managed to push my luck to the limits with that picture, at least for now

 

[DennisN]

but it was a dark (really dark!) forest on the darker side of a hill, with only the basic (cheap) zoom optics...

I understand. And I know it's extra difficult to shoot birds in the shade, as I've found they have a tendency to visually "melt" into the background.

 

[DennisN]

If you would like to try to get less motion blur from a flying bird

We have upgraded to a real camera just recently - still learning it, though - but it was a dark (really dark!) forest on the darker side of a hill, with only the basic (cheap) zoom optics...

By the way, I looked for and found the article I read about wildlife photography.
It was that article that made me start experimenting with fast exposures and high ISO.
(I might aswell notify @Andy Resnick since he likes to shoot birds too... )

Don’t be afraid of shooting at high ISO (amateurphotographer.com)
"Nature photographer Marsel van Oosten urges you to not be frightened of shooting at high ISO."
https://amateurphotographer.com/technique/expert_advice/shooting-at-high-iso/

(and there are some splendid photos in that article too )

 

[DennisN]

I just saw this gorgeous photo in an article :
(the colors, the lights, the atmosphere, just wow )

"Sun rising behind Salisbury Cathedral, Wiltshire."

 

[morrobay]

Jomtien Beach

 

[berkeman]

Shouldn't that be out in Morro Bay somewhere?

 

[DennisN]

A bird taking off

I recently have been experimenting with shooting flying birds

Here's my first success in shooting a flying bird.
(I've got better ones, but I haven't processed them yet, so I thought I'd share this first sequence for fun ).

I saw this seagull landing on a tall pole ca 50 meters away from me.
I had no tripod with me, so I placed my camera on top of a public wastebasket, targeted it at the seagull and focused. And then I waited patiently...

Sitting and enjoying the sun...

Calling out...

Taking off...
(I had hoped to shoot it earlier in the takeoff, i.e. with its wings out while the feet were still on the pole, but I did not succeed in this try. The takeoff goes incredibly fast, so you have to be really alert and ready to shoot! )

And off we go...

...to some new location...

...where there's maybe some food.

Gear: Sony A6000 + Sony 55-210mm (at 210mm)
Settings: f/8, ISO 800, 1/1250 s exposure time
Additional settings: Fastest burst mode (11 frames per second in RAW) & continous autofocus and subject tracking)

 

[jtbell]

Maybe it looks dark blue on that photo due to partial transparency of the flag (i.e. the light from the blue background sky comes partly through, just a guess), and/or I did something weird when I edited in Photoshop .

This reminds me of the back-and-forth about colors in flags in my entry in one of the old photo contest threads.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/pf-photo-contest-flags-of-nations-5-26-6-1.948232/

 

[morrobay]

Sunday night party+ the old songs dialed up: Stand by Me

 

[DennisN]

Fly, fly, away...
...here are some newly processed photos of seagulls taking off and flying which I got pretty happy with .

Takeoff!
(here I got it with at least one foot left on the pole )

...and away.

(Settings for these two photos: f/8, 1/4000s exposure, ISO 1000)

Note: When I think of it, these kinds of photos could perhaps be taken with a prime tele lens too (i.e. a lens without zoom). If one would set it up on a tripod and set the focus beforehand, it might work. And without image stabilization, one might be able to use a remote shutter control to start the image capture. Hmm... maybe something to try...Another creature up in the air:
(it looks like there is some damage on its left wing)

"I can at least pretend I'm an eagle"

(Settings for these two photos: f/9, 1/4000s exposure, ISO 1600, and
actually shot handheld; luckily the camera has image stabilization and a tracking autofocus mode...
...I would not be able to get these two shots without it )

 

[Tom.G]

There used to be 3rd party/public domain software to replace the original camera Operating System, at least for Canon cameras.

One of the features was motion detect, great for snapping Humming Birds and Orioles at the feeder outside the living room window!

 

[morrobay]

Jomtien Beach

 

[DennisN]

One of the features was motion detect, great for snapping Humming Birds and Orioles at the feeder outside the living room window!

If you've got such photos it would be fun to see!

 

[BillTre]

Moving Picture:

 

[morrobay]

Friday 0730

 

[pinball1970]

Ben Nevis, one the three peaks. My very good friend and work colleague completed the challenge at the weekend.

 

[DennisN]

Ben Nevis, one the three peaks. My very good friend and work colleague completed the challenge at the weekend.

Awesome photo and gorgeous surroundings! Scotland... mmm...

 

[DennisN]

A seagull juvenile on a sidewalk:

 

[morrobay]

I was looking for birds around these small fishing boats. Nada

 

[Averagesupernova]

Sorry folks, I only have critter pix.

 

[DennisN]

I was looking for birds around these small fishing boats. Nada

A very colorful photo, though!

 

[morrobay]

The view across Naklua bay up to the deep water - Lam Chabang port. + My Thai massage friend who just returned from her rice farm up-country

 

[Rive]

Decrease the exposure time/shutter speed to ca 1/1000 sec (or less; less is even better).

Such a short exposure time will make the photos darker, so compensate by increasing ISO to let's say somewhere between ISO 1000 - 2500 (ca, your mileage may vary).

Not quite there yet, I think

(Common sparrow taking a dustbath...)

... but closing

 

[pinball1970]

A seagull juvenile on a sidewalk:

View attachment 327998

View attachment 327999

Scruffy little thing isn't it? What species? @Astranut Although you tend to get back on the late side!