Random Photos

In summary: I only remember the Canadian part.I took this photo of some Canadian wolves a few weeks ago.In summary, the photo is of Canadian wolves.
  • #2,346
Arjan82 said:
But it was captured by Hubble:
View attachment 353877

It looks rather different though :)

The observation with the spitzer telescope comes closer:
View attachment 353878

Here some more and a comparison:
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/videos/1102-Video

Part of it was done by Hubble (i.e., HST). But I don't think the whole thing was. I'm pretty sure the rest was done with a wider field telescope.

Here's an an article from Hubblesite.org:
https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-releases/2003/news-2003-11.html?news=true
STScI-01EVSRZ30N99FFW54XDTG5G8P5.png


"The composite picture is a seamless blend of ultra-sharp images from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope combined with the wide view of the Mosaic Camera on the National Science Foundation's 0.9-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson, Ariz."

I'm pretty sure the reason they referenced Hubble in the link you gave, is not to say that HST imaged the whole thing, but rather that they were comparing visible to infrared, and Hubble (HST) is in the visible.

[Edit: By the way, I have new data from my backyard telescope (C14 EdgeHD) of The Helix Nebula in the queue to be processed. It was shot in the visible spectrum, of course, but with narrowband filters. I'll post it in a few weeks in the "Our Beautiful Universe" thread." So far, it looks very promising. It's amazing what you can do with a backyard telescope these days.]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top