MHB Ratio problem: The ratio of Liquid X to Liquid Y in a mixture is 3 to 7

AI Thread Summary
The ratio of Liquid X to Liquid Y in a mixture is established as 3 to 7. Given that the amount of Liquid Y is 161, the calculation for Liquid X can be derived using the ratio. By setting up the equation X = (3/7) * 161, Liquid X is determined to be approximately 69. The total amount in the mixture is not necessary for finding Liquid X. Thus, the solution focuses solely on the ratio and the known quantity of Liquid Y.
JohnDoe01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The ratio of Liquid X to Liquid Y in a mixture is 3 to 7. If the amount of Liquid Y in a mixture is 161, then the amount of Liquid x in the mixture is equal to?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $m$ be the total amount in the mixture. Then,

$$Y=\frac{7m}{10}=161$$

From that, can you find the amount for $X$, i.e. $\frac{3}{10}$ of the mixture?
 
Personally I wouldn't worry about the total amount at all. You are told that "ratio of Liquid X to Liquid Y in a mixture is 3 to 7" so [math]\frac{X}{Y}= \frac{3}{7}[/math]. You are told that "the amount of Liquid Y in a mixture is 161" so [math]\frac{X}{161}= \frac{3}{7}[/math]. [math]X= \frac{3}{7}(161)[/math].
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top