RC circuit - Capacitor discharge

AI Thread Summary
When a capacitor discharges, the potential difference across its plates equals that across the resistor. The equation governing this process is derived from Kirchhoff's Second Law, which states that the sum of voltages in a closed loop must equal zero. The correct expression for charge over time is q(t) = Q_0 exp(-t/RC), indicating the need for a negative sign in the original equation. The discussion highlights that during discharge, dq/dt is negative, leading to a contradiction if not properly accounted for. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing RC circuits.
jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
When a capacitor discharges, the potential difference between its plates and the resistor's terminals is the same. Hence,

\frac{Q}{C}=R \frac{dq}{dt}
Solving this equation we get

q(t)= Q_{0} exp \frac{t}{RC}

Obviously, this isn't the solution. It is actually q(t)= Q_0 exp \frac{-t}{RC}. So, I'm missing a minus sign on the original equation.

But why should it be there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Kirchoff's Second Law, the sum of the voltages is equal to zero. R(dQ/dt) + (Q/C) = 0, therefore you need -R(dQ/dt) = (Q/C). I apologize for the lack of proper script.
 
Thank you.
Didn't know such laws.
 
If the capacitor discharges, then dq/dt is negative, so according toyour originial equation, Q/C which is positive equals something negative
 
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Back
Top