- #71
nismaratwork
- 359
- 0
Ivan Seeking said:
Good one Ivan.Jimmy Snyder: And a har har to you too.
Real Book vs E-Book: Which Do You Prefer & Why?
- Thread starter The legend
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Book
In summary, e-books are good for having books available without taking up space, for being environmentally friendly, and for being able to see references and figures easily.
Good one Ivan.Jimmy Snyder: And a har har to you too.
- #72
The legend
- 422
- 0
nice one Ivan. PF is full of funny people!
- #73
xunxine
- 31
- 0
I would normally prefer a real book, partly because it is less painful to the eyes and has the feel of a BOOK. Much like comparing having a real pet cat and a virtual one in those apps or the 90s tamagochi.
For leisure reading, I love holding a book and have a sense of motivation to see how thick (ie. how many pages) I have read and how much more to go. It is also easier to refer to a physical book. Just reach out for it, flip it and leave it open on my desk. If it's an e-book, I guess I'll have to switch on the device, open the app, find the book and search for whatever. And I'm also at the mercy of its battery life or electrical wires and how updated it is.
However, when I'm standing in a crowded bus or have only 1 free hand, I'd whip out my iphone to read an e-book. In this case, it is very convenient. Plus, I get to highlight the words that I don't understand and open up the dictionary entry, all with just a thumb. This convenience is not matched by a real book. Currently, I'm in between reading a real book when I get a seat on the bus, and an e-book when I don't.
Though they are getting more affordable (or so I read), e-book readers are still not cheap. How many of us have the luxury of getting the most advanced readers to put our millions of books inside? The real book is still affordable, can be bought at second-hand stores for as low as $1, be borrowed from libraries and shared with other people without fear of infringing copyright. Even in developed countries, there are still people who are financially strapped. Donations of books are very much welcome. In fact, at the moment I'm planning to give away some reading materials to a less developed country to be distributed to the children in their villages.
Real books can be enjoyed by all, e-books by those who can afford it. IMHO only
For leisure reading, I love holding a book and have a sense of motivation to see how thick (ie. how many pages) I have read and how much more to go. It is also easier to refer to a physical book. Just reach out for it, flip it and leave it open on my desk. If it's an e-book, I guess I'll have to switch on the device, open the app, find the book and search for whatever. And I'm also at the mercy of its battery life or electrical wires and how updated it is.
However, when I'm standing in a crowded bus or have only 1 free hand, I'd whip out my iphone to read an e-book. In this case, it is very convenient. Plus, I get to highlight the words that I don't understand and open up the dictionary entry, all with just a thumb. This convenience is not matched by a real book. Currently, I'm in between reading a real book when I get a seat on the bus, and an e-book when I don't.
Though they are getting more affordable (or so I read), e-book readers are still not cheap. How many of us have the luxury of getting the most advanced readers to put our millions of books inside? The real book is still affordable, can be bought at second-hand stores for as low as $1, be borrowed from libraries and shared with other people without fear of infringing copyright. Even in developed countries, there are still people who are financially strapped. Donations of books are very much welcome. In fact, at the moment I'm planning to give away some reading materials to a less developed country to be distributed to the children in their villages.
Real books can be enjoyed by all, e-books by those who can afford it. IMHO only
- #74
airborne18
- 25
- 0
Amazon has free Kindle software for the PC. The real benefit is that they have a ton public domain books for free in the Kindle Store. Apparently they are much cleaner than the pdf downloads on google.
- #75
abluphoton
- 20
- 0
Ebooks.. because you get them for free.. :D
- #76
JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
abluphoton said:
Not necessarily.
Most now require you to buy them for devices such as the iPad and Kindle.
- #77
Pythagorean
Gold Member
- 4,409
- 320
DaveC426913 said:
You tell me. My town runs on hydro and wind power. =P
- #78
JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
Pythagorean said:
Well the question is, is it better for people to use electronic readers or is it better for people to use books?
In other words, is it more of an impact to produce, transport and use an electronic reader or produce and transport a book?
Taking into consideration transport for books will have a larger impact than readers, but then readers will require energy to use. (Of course, if energy is from wind / hydro etc it's not such an impact.) But also that books can be recycled into new books relatively easily.
An interesting comparison.
- #79
Pythagorean
Gold Member
- 4,409
- 320
jarednjames said:
I was being playful, but also illustrating the idea that the power source of electronic devices is malleable in principle. It doesn't have to come from the ugly double f.
To be honest, I think my town is only 80% green right now. The goal is 95% (by adding more wind if this trial is effective). We've had hydro for as long as I've been alive and as citizens, we own shares in the power company even (i.e. it's truly public).
In any case, the energy I use to power my devices is the renewable portion =P
- #80
JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
I didn't mean to aim it specifically at you, however I felt it was a good jumping in point.
Renewable in your town, although a good thing and thus removing the 'energy for use' component, doesn't mean e-readers are better than books straight away.
If the impact from producing an e-reader is greater than that of producing a book, all the renewable energy available for use isn't going to make a difference. I do feel that books will ultimately lose out when it comes to transport impact.
Renewable in your town, although a good thing and thus removing the 'energy for use' component, doesn't mean e-readers are better than books straight away.
If the impact from producing an e-reader is greater than that of producing a book, all the renewable energy available for use isn't going to make a difference. I do feel that books will ultimately lose out when it comes to transport impact.
- #81
Pythagorean
Gold Member
- 4,409
- 320
jarednjames said:
not quite. e-readers can support several equivalent books, so you mean "If the impact from producing an e-reader is greater than that of producing X books..."
where X is the average amount of books owned by someone who is willing to buy an e-reader in the first place.
I own on the order of 10^2 paper books.
I'm sure plastic, gold, and silicon are infinitely times less renewable though :/
- #82
JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
Pythagorean said:
Yes, sorry should have been clearer (same applies to transport).
Certainly.
I don't own many books, I prefer everything in e-book format on my laptop so I can take it everywhere with me without additional weight. Plus I can have a number of backups, without the need for 'excessive' storage (for the backup or original).
- #83
Dr Lots-o'watts
- 646
- 0
Pythagorean said:
They are very recyclable though, and renewable energy can be used for that.
- #84
nismaratwork
- 359
- 0
Dr Lots-o'watts said:They are very recyclable though, and renewable energy can be used for that.
Yeah, but the processes used to separate the precious metals from the boards and connectors can be anything from safe and well done... or more commonly it's shipped overseas and it's an environmental disaster. If you want to reclaim gold you need heat, and/or acid, and the acid-crap mixture is often dumped into rivers and other bodies of water.
JarednJames: Even books that haven't been released as e-books are often available free in formats that can be converted for any e-reader. It doesn't please me, but it's another issue e-books... to what degree will publishing (which has dealt with piracy in analog) be able to manage the electronic manifestation of this difficulty? Movies are large, and can be packed with features to make it less desirable to pirated them, and often games use multiplayer or other online components to verify that a copy is legitimate. A book is rarely going to exceed a megabyte, and the concept of viable copy protection when people are scanning pages onto PDF files seems absurd. As someone who's written before, and would like to again, I can only hope readers represent a less predatory pool.
- #85
JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
nismar, I wasn't saying you can't get them free, I deliberately tried to ignore illegal file use.
If a book is brought out via a paid means (and only legally available via that means), and it turns up at a free source then it is an illegal copy and something they need to try to work against.
Now, if you got rid of regular books and only published in an encrypted e-book format, it's problem solved so far as piracy goes (prevent printing and other actions).
But, if you insist on using paper books then you are constantly open to piracy whether you like it or not. There's nothing you can do about that.
I ignored illegal copies as my comment was aimed more towards items which are only available in e-book format and are secured. (I have a number of course textbooks like this.) However, the simple fact as I put it above stands. If you use paper copies, you are open to privacy. There's nothing you can do about it.
EDIT: I suppose you could supply each book with a 'secure key' which e-readers can read and check for legitimate copies. If it doesn't have it, it doesn't work. I'm thinking of Apple style tech where you can't install an app unless it has been purchased via your account. So the only way to get an e-book on your e-reader would be to purchase it through a store with your account. But even then if you 'jailbreak' it (as per apple tech) you can get around that.
If a book is brought out via a paid means (and only legally available via that means), and it turns up at a free source then it is an illegal copy and something they need to try to work against.
Now, if you got rid of regular books and only published in an encrypted e-book format, it's problem solved so far as piracy goes (prevent printing and other actions).
But, if you insist on using paper books then you are constantly open to piracy whether you like it or not. There's nothing you can do about that.
I ignored illegal copies as my comment was aimed more towards items which are only available in e-book format and are secured. (I have a number of course textbooks like this.) However, the simple fact as I put it above stands. If you use paper copies, you are open to privacy. There's nothing you can do about it.
EDIT: I suppose you could supply each book with a 'secure key' which e-readers can read and check for legitimate copies. If it doesn't have it, it doesn't work. I'm thinking of Apple style tech where you can't install an app unless it has been purchased via your account. So the only way to get an e-book on your e-reader would be to purchase it through a store with your account. But even then if you 'jailbreak' it (as per apple tech) you can get around that.
- #86
mugaliens
- 197
- 1
I buy used books for around 50 cents each, and I never have to worry about a power surge or equipment failure deleting them.