- #106
Auto-Didact
- 751
- 562
The point is though that his entire argument that non-locality doesn't exist is based on assuming the validity of Bohmian mechanics, which is an explicitly non-local theory. Carrying out this argument as a logical derivation therefore leads to a contradiction and so quite ironically actually proves that non-locality does exist.akvadrako said:Thanks for your review. I was trying to select the most focused paper to demonstrate the way local splitting works; next time I'll pick a different one. I was only talking about the initial part though; nothing past equation 11.
Moreover, Tipler despite being a serious physicist with a professorship is a known crackpot, with his work on theological physics rivalling only Polkinghorne. This just goes to show that even the best pedigree in physics means almost nothing.