Recirculating DE Mixture Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter The0wn4g3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving a rigid tank with saltwater and the dynamics of concentration changes due to inflow and outflow rates. The initial attempt at solving the differential equation for concentration change was flawed, as it did not account for the tank's volume. The corrected equation includes the volume in the outflow calculation, leading to a more accurate representation of concentration dynamics. After applying randomly chosen values, the results appear reasonable, prompting the user to seek validation of their solution. The conversation highlights the importance of incorporating all relevant factors in differential equations for accurate modeling.
The0wn4g3
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rigid tank of volume "V" contains salt dissolved in water at a concentration "C". Fresh water flows into the tank at a rate of "F". A fraction "x" of the exit flow is recirculated back into the entrance flow.

Given:
V, Volume of tank
Fin, Flow rate in
Fo, Flow rate out
x, Fraction of volume flow-rate recirculated
Co, Initial concentration
C(t), Concentration in tank at time t

img002.jpg


Homework Equations



\frac{dC}{dt}=\text{concentration of salt entering}-\text{concentration of salt leaving}

C_{in}=xFC(t)

C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)

so \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-(1-x)FC(t)

When I plot this using Euler's Method, I get this graph. This is obviously incorrect, because it does not reflect exponential decay. Can someone help me out? I'm really not sure what I've done wrong.
untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may have found my own mistake. I totally forgot to take into account to volume of the tank. I believe this wound change the Flow Out equation to:

<br /> C_{out}=(1-x)FC(t)<br />

so the final equation would be:

<br /> \frac{dC}{dt}=xFC(t)-\frac{(1-x)FC(t)}{V}<br />

is this correct?

With some randomly chosen values (V=10,000 ft^3/s F=10 ft^3 x=.2 Co=.8) I get this, which seems much more reasonable.

untitled-1.jpg
 
Anyone want to qualify my answer here? Should I re-post this somewhere else? Hello?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top