I Reichenbach Synchronisation: Proving i=r

wnvl2
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
I use Reichenbach synchronisation. The one-way speed of light (OWSOL) in the x and y-direction is ##\frac{c}{2\epsilon}## and in the reverse direction it is for both ##\frac{c}{2(1-\epsilon)}## such that the average round trip speed of light is ##c##. For any choice of ##\epsilon## the physical laws should remain the sames as for ##\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}##.

My goal is to prove that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection. When using Huyghens it is obvous that I get a different result.

How can I prove ##i = r##?
mirror.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I use units where ##c=1## and Anderson coordinates so ##\kappa=2 \epsilon-1##. The transform between Minkowski coordinates (lower case) and Anderson coordinates (upper case) is: $$ t=T+\kappa X$$ $$x=X$$ $$y=Y$$ $$z=Z$$

So, in the Minkowski coordinates we can write the equation of an ingoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##\lambda<0## and the equation of an outgoing null geodesic as $$r^\mu(t,x,y,z) = \left( \lambda, \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ for ##0<\lambda##.

Then transforming from the Minkowski coordinates to the Anderson coordinates we get $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda + \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$ and $$r^\mu(T,X,Y,Z) = \left( \lambda - \frac{\kappa\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} , \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} ,0 \right)$$

So the transformation does not affect the spatial coordinates, just the temporal coordinate. So the angle is the same in both cases.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and wnvl2
Do you have a link about "Anderson coordinates"?
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top