- #1
- 8,615
- 4,649
I just came across the following paper:
Gisin, N. (2011). Impossibility of covariant deterministic nonlocal hidden-variable extensions of quantum theory. Physical Review A, 83(2), 020102.
proving that, under sensible hypotheses, nonlocal hidden variable theories for relativistic quantum mechanics are impossible. Discussions of the assumptions can be found in
Laudisa, F. (2014). Against the ‘no-go’philosophy of quantum mechanics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 1-17.
This paper criticizes Gisin's assumptions.
Oldofredi, Andrea. "No-Go Theorems and the Foundations of Quantum Physics." Journal for General Philosophy of Science(2018): 1-16.
This paper rebuts the criticism of Laudisa.
Nikolic, H. (2013). Time and probability: From classical mechanics to relativistic Bohmian mechanics. Unpublished.
This paper shows on p.45 and example of relativistic Bohmian trajectories for a system with 3 particles. Clearly, the trajectory of the third particle violates causality. Thus something is really wrong with the relativistic Bohmian dynamics proposed there. This does not inspire much faith in the credibility of the criticism of Gisin given on p.46.
Gisin, N. (2011). Impossibility of covariant deterministic nonlocal hidden-variable extensions of quantum theory. Physical Review A, 83(2), 020102.
proving that, under sensible hypotheses, nonlocal hidden variable theories for relativistic quantum mechanics are impossible. Discussions of the assumptions can be found in
Laudisa, F. (2014). Against the ‘no-go’philosophy of quantum mechanics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 1-17.
This paper criticizes Gisin's assumptions.
Oldofredi, Andrea. "No-Go Theorems and the Foundations of Quantum Physics." Journal for General Philosophy of Science(2018): 1-16.
This paper rebuts the criticism of Laudisa.
Nikolic, H. (2013). Time and probability: From classical mechanics to relativistic Bohmian mechanics. Unpublished.
This paper shows on p.45 and example of relativistic Bohmian trajectories for a system with 3 particles. Clearly, the trajectory of the third particle violates causality. Thus something is really wrong with the relativistic Bohmian dynamics proposed there. This does not inspire much faith in the credibility of the criticism of Gisin given on p.46.