Relativity: Rocket shoots a bullet straight down

AI Thread Summary
A rocket traveling at 0.8c launches a projectile at 0.6c perpendicular to its motion, raising questions about the projectile's speed in the Earth's reference frame. The initial approach using one-dimensional relativistic velocity addition is flawed due to the multi-directional nature of the velocities involved. The correct method requires applying the vector form of velocity addition, considering that time is experienced differently on the rocket compared to Earth. This discrepancy affects the perceived speed of the projectile, which cannot simply be calculated as the square root of the sum of the squares of the velocities. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding relativistic effects in multi-dimensional motion.
mitchmaniac20
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rocket passes the Earth at 0.8c. As it goes by, it launches a projectile at 0.6c perpendicular to the direction of motion. What is the projectile's speed in the Earth's reference frame?

Homework Equations



[;u=\frac{u'+v}{1+u'v/{c}^{2}};]

The Attempt at a Solution



Since in the direction of the rocket's motion, u'=0, u=v=.8c. In the perpendicular direction since v=0, u'=u=.6c. However, this makes the overall speed of the projectile [;\sqrt{{.8c}^{2}+{.6c}^{2}}=c;], which shouldn't be possible...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is incorrect to use the one-dimensional relativistic velocity addition formula if there are motions in multiple directions. In that case you need to take account of the more general vector form for velocity addition. This is essentially because even though all of the rocket's motion is perpendicular to the projectile's motion, time is still measured differently on the rocket than on Earth, so what the rocket sees as 0.6 c in the perpendicular direction, we will necessarily see as something different.
 
Thanks, this was actually part b where part a was to derive the velocity transformations in the direction perpendicular to motion, which I had incorrectly found to be u'=u, but your comment made me rethink that. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top